News Update

FM says Chief Economic Adviser Arvind Subramanian’s tenure to be extended till Oct, 2018Income Tax conducts search at premises of S M Krishna's son-in-law who heads CCD GroupPak troops shoot at BSF posts in J&K; 5 injuredGST on 'out and out' transactions (See 'TOG Insight' in Taxongo.com)Whether due date for submission of GST TRANS-1 is really extended?Illegal income tax raids - Govt advises taxpayers to inspect warrants of searchesCII calls for 1% interest rate cut for job creationAffordable housing - Industry takes up GST issue with GovtIncome Tax - Provisions of Sec 115O do trench on powers of State Legislature to tax agri income but such incidential trenching does not warrant annulment of legislation: Supreme CourtGST - Govt notifies new rates for Duty Credit Scrips, saree falls, roasted grams and many other items + restriction on refund for corduroy fabrics + exemption to khadi fabric, musical instruments and many other items + clarity on issue of cereals etc sold in unit container with brand nameJuly GSTR-3B can now be edited and submitted: GSTNBlockage of Exporters' working capital - Govt exploring link between GSTR-1 & GSTR-3B Govt grants conditional IGST exemption to skimmed milk powder or concentrated milkCBI arrests Mumbai DCIT in alleged Rs 3 Crore corruption caseSC favours creation of portal to attend to home buyers’ grievancesNPPA notifies ceiling price exclusive of GST for 7 drugs including Rifabutin & Hepatitis B ImmunoglobulinCentral Govt notifies Porbandar Wildlife Sanctuary as Eco-sensitive zone; Industries not allowed in its surroundingsYogi Adityanath’s resignation from Lok Sabha notified to be valid from Sept 21, 2017New Drawback Rules, 2017 and AIR of Drawback explainedWealth Tax - Amendment made to Sec 40(3) vide FAs 1983 & 1988 is substantive in nature and that is why it cannot be retrospective: HCI-T- Simply because Writ Court has struck down previous transfer order u/s 127(2)(a), Department is not precluded from initiating fresh procedure: HCGST - Rs 65k Cr TRANS-1 Credit is much less than Rs 1.3 lakh crore as closing balance: GovtDoT finalises guidelines for settlement of claimsNITI, IRF Geneva sign pact in field of Intelligent Transport SystemsCBI nabs former HC Judge in medical admission scamGSTN informs that portal for uploading application seeking advance ruling to be ready only in Jan 2018 - HC questions authority for postponementCBEC makes many amendments in Drawback Rules; excludes many items from list of eligible goods + lists out goods where no drawback is to be determined; New rates to come in force from Oct 1, 2017I-T - Settlement Commission has no authority to review / reopen matters already concluded before it: HC
 
Exchange Rates for November Notified

TIOL-DDT 1722
28.10.2011
Friday

CBEC has notified the Exchange Rates for imported goods and export goods for November 2011.

CBEC Notification No. 74/2011-Cus.,(N.T.), Dated: October 27, 2011

No Bench of the Tribunal to hear Stay Petition – Department wants to Collect – Do fill Up the Vacancy in the Tribunal

WHEN it comes to collection of dues (duly or unduly adjudicated), the Central Excise Department wants to use all its might against the unfortunate assessee.

Look at a classic case:

A Commissioner adjudicated a case demanding about two Crores of rupees. The assessee went in appeal to the Tribunal with a stay application. The case was posted in the Tribunal on two days and on both the days, it had to be adjourned as there was no sitting of the bench. So the case could not be heard by the Tribunal – but the department is not concerned with this – they want their pound of flesh. When a stay application is pending in a higher forum, the Department should not take any coercive action to recover the adjudicated amount, but usually the Department is not bothered about such niceties and very often they threaten the assessees with coercive action. The hapless assessee had to approach the High Court. In the High Court, the Department's Counsel argued that since 6 month's time has already expired from the date of filing the stay application, as per the Act, the Department is at liberty to proceed further. However, he fairly conceded that there was no regular sitting of the Bench in the Tribunal and it is also not disputed that the stay petition filed by the petitioner in the appeal filed as against the order dated 23.11.2010 has not been taken up only on account of the same.

The High Court observed that when the petitioner has taken the required steps in time and when the stay application has not been taken up by the Appellate Tribunal for no fault of the petitioner and when the said application is still pending before the Tribunal, the authorities, at this stage, need not take any coercive steps.

It was brought to the notice of the Court that not only in this case, but also in other matters, there is no regular sitting of the Bench of the Tribunal. Consequently, according to the counsel, number of matters, as on date, is pending and only in the event of the vacancy of Judicial Member of the Tribunal being filled up, the pending cases can be taken up and disposed of.

The High Court directed the Department's Counsel to take steps to bring to the notice of the authority concerned, the existing vacancy, with a request to fill up the same. This order was delivered by the High Court on September 29 and the position remains the same even today. The problem has only worsened with the retirement of Vice-President Jyoti Balasundaram.

It may be understandable that the Government has difficulties in appointing Members, but is the assessee responsible for this? Why should the Central Excise Department overact to collect dues when the matter is pending in the Tribunal and the department is well aware of the situation in the Tribunal? By taking coercive action and closing down factories, what do they get? They will lose even the revenue that they are getting and workers may become unemployed. Of course, there is one beneficiary in this – the lawyer!

We bring you the High Court order today. Please see Breaking News

CBDT and CBEC Members not to move into Rajaswa Bhavan

BULGING babudom has created space constraints in the North Block and a new National Tax Headquarters for the Central Revenue officers is coming up in Lutyen's Delhi – the Rajaswa Bhavan. The Bhavan was to house all the revenue offices of the CBEC and CBDT including all the directorates. The 75000 sq.m glass building hoped to be ready by 2014 is envisaged as an edifice epitomizing India's changing attitudes. The use of glass fosters a belief in the public's perception of Government, as moving from a closed, opaque and stoic system to a more open and transparent one.

Both the Boards were also supposed to shift to the new Bhavan, but there was stiff opposition from some quarters on shifting the Boards. A senior officer told us two years ago that it is not proper to shift the Chairman and Members of the two Revenue Boards. One reason is that the status and prestige attached to an office in the North Block cannot be compared to the best glasshouse in the world. And when the Chairman comes to meet the Finance Minister in the North Block, where will he sit? Even Joint Secretaries may put on a red light and not welcome the Chairman into their rooms and the Chairman will also have to wander in the corridors of power.

It seems, finally the Boards have succeeded in convincing the powers that be, to retain the offices of the Chairman and Members of the CBDT and CBEC in the North Block. Any day the inconvenience in North Block is preferable to the ultra modern luxury in Rajaswa Bhavan.

Ban on ICT for Central Excise Inspectors, Superintendents lifted

THE CBEC has lifted the ban on Inter Commissionerate transfer of Group B and C employees of the Central Excise Department. Now Inspectors, Superintendents and other employees of the Department can apply for transfer from one cadre controlling authority to another. However, they will lose their seniority.

CBEC F. No. A.22015/23/2011-Ad IIIA dated: October 27, 2011

The Super Rich Indians - Mukesh Continues to head list but with reduced wealth - No politician in list

ACCORDING to the Planning Commission, even I am super rich and so are you. Forbes' latest list of India's hundred richest persons has Mukesh Ambani heading the list with a wealth of about Rs. 1.13 lakh Crores. It is said that there are politicians who have more wealth than that, but not a single politician figures in the list.

The poorest of the richest Indians, GVK Reddy is worth just 1850 Crores. Anil Ambani is at No. 13 with 30,000 Crores. Vijay Mallya is at midpoint at No. 49 with 5500 Crores. Narayana Murthy, GM Rao and Nandan Nilekani are richer. Savitri Jindal is the richest lady with about 48000 Crores.

Jurisprudentiol – Monday's cases

Legal Corner IconCustoms

When proposal for confiscation and penalties are consequent to allegation of undervaluation resulting in demand of differential duty under section 28, time limit of five years applies: CESTAT

SECTION 28 prescribes issue of show cause notice within maximum five years from the relevant date. The proposal for confiscation and imposition of penalties are directly linked to demand of differential duty invoking extended period of limitation. Even though Section 124 does not specify a time limit, the same cannot exceed the, maximum time limit of five years prescribed under Section 28 of the Customs Act.

Income Tax

Whether expenditure incurred on reconditioning of machinery lying idle in broken-down condition but produces benefit of enduring nature on repair, is to be treated as revenue expenditure - NO, rules HC

ASSESSEE claimed expenditure incurred as repairs and reconditioning of Machinery treating it as current repairs. The machine was purchased by the assessee in the year 1981 which was broke down on 24.10.1991. AO observed that the expenditure incurred for reconditioning the machine had given the assessee a benefit of enduring nature and therefore, the amount was not allowable as current repairs. The issue before the Bench is - Whether expenditure incurred on reconditioning of machinery, lying idle in a broken-down condition, but produces benefit of enduring nature on repair, is to be treated as revenue expenditure.

Central Excise

Show Cause notice demanding duty issued to legal heir after death of sole Proprietor - There is no provision in Central Excise law or rules framed there under for such an action - Stay granted: CESTAT

IN a case where show-cause notice issued after the death of proprietor of the concern to legal heir of proprietor and proprietary concern not maintainable in absence of such provision in the Central Excise law. In the circumstances the pre-deposit of duty, interest and penalty is waived and recovery thereof stayed during the pendency of the appeal.

See our columns Monday for the judgements

Until Monday with more DDT

Have a Nice Weekend.

Mail your comments to vijaywrite@taxindiaonline.com


 RECENT DISCUSSION(S) POST YOUR COMMENTS
   
 
Sub: LIFTING BAN ON ICTs

It is a drastic ,positive decision,indeed.Though seniority is stated to be not admissible,certain saving clauses are in built therein.Again, the order discriminates men already on deputation on "spouse ground,compassionata and physically handicapped" vis-a vis other deputationists.in the matter of seniority/date from which seniority will count...etc.It appears that the restriction that one group should revert back from deputation and seek fresh ICT while others get absorbed from their date of deputation can not be justified as legally sustainable..Hence, the seniority disputes will still be on increase..
Moreover, certain doubts /cofusion still persist in this order itself. Pl. see last sentence of para 2(i) and para 2(ii) reads as follows:- "However, such transferred officer will retain his/her eligibility of the parent Commissionerate for his/her promotion to the next higher grade, etc,
(iii) On transfer he/she will not be considered for promotion in the old Cammissionerate." As rightly stated in DDT,another important aspect is that the orders being applicable to all group B,C and D cadres, even supdts can get ICT now;and more safe even--seniority being on all india basis for promotion.(Earlier orders had the restriction that only in DR quota ,the ICT will be allowed,now there is no such clause.Does it also mean that even against promotion quota vacancies,the ICTs will be allowed;if so adversely affecting the promotion prospects of candidates of parent /receiving commte. Strictly, the CCs should be permitted only to move along with the post.ie. both post and man should be transferred to maintain the statusquo in promotion matters in all cadres... ).


Posted by Unnikrishnan V
 
Sub: Rajaswa Bhavan

It is not new to hear that the Board Members and Chairmen of CBEC & CBDT do not wish to move to the new Rajaswa Bhavan when the same comes up in the year 2014.

Frankly speaking, there should not be any laxity on the part of the Government to summon the Revenue bosses and ask them to take their seats in the new building as and when it comes up. If the Members wish North Block should be their mailing address, the new building may be alternatively named North Block Extension merely to satisfy their bloated egos.

Obduracy has been the hallmark of a few in the Cadre and the sooner it is stomped out the better it would be for the Department.

One should be proud to have his office in the magnificent and modern day building that is going to come up in the near future. After all the architect who came up with this award winning design won a 20 lakh award.

But for Revenue bosses of the ilks of Vermas and Ajwanis and the one who lost the race, it would be a blot on our image if the new Bhavan houses them. We need a symbol which reflects the transparency and economic growth in the Country and the new building can after all do without such greats!

Pity.

Posted by sachin deshmukh
 

TIOL Tube Latest

GST: एक देश एक कर | गोष्ठी - संस्करण ३