Taxindiaonline.com Taxindiaonline.com Taxindiainternational.com HRindiaonline.com
 
LOGIN
Forgot Password |  Register
Wednesday , November 26, 2014 | Updated : Nov 26, 10:57 IST
Income Tax    Customs    Excise    Service Tax    FEMA    DGFT    SEZ    Misc    Pitara    Budget   
About Us Contact Us Advertise
Taxindiaonline.com Taxindiaonline.com Taxindiainternational.com
NEWS FLASH
 
I-T- Whether when Revenue has issued restraint order against goods seized u/s 132(1), HC is right in directing official to make inventory of goods and then quash search proceedings on basis of Report submitted by official - NO: SC (See 'Breaking News') Procedure of service tax refund/exemption to SEZ - CBEC Instructions (See 'DDT' Column) CENVAT - Rule 2(l) - Services namely, Brokerage for sale or purchase of shares for Trading, Custodian charges, Event management are in nature of input services having nexus to business activity of Banking - stay granted: CESTAT (See 'Breaking News') Perplexity in taxing Liaison Office (See 'Guest' Column) CX - Clandestine Removal - pan masala and gutkha - What is required to be proved by Department is preponderance of probability - Matter remanded with pre-deposit: CESTAT (See 'Breaking News') NGOs diverting foreign funds - 24 cases referred to CBI (See 'Mixed Buzz') Delay of 472 days in filing Cross objections - Pay Rs 25,000/- to PM's Relief Fund (See 'DDT') I-T - Whether when assessee's wife was under treatment for cancer in some other city during period of delay, it would be a reasonable cause for condoning delay in filing appeal after expiry of limitation: ITAT (See '2014-TIOL-895') Mandatory fixed pre-deposit – Appeal forms need amendment (See 'DDT') Contribute Rs 1 Crore to Swachh Bharat Kosh and receive acknowledgement signed by PM himself India, USA resolve to enhance bilateral trade (See 'Mixed Buzz') RBI issues fresh direction on routing of funds raised overseas to India (See Cir 41 in 'What's New') Capital Goods Scheme - Govt earmarks Rs 581 Cr as budgetary support (See 'Mixed Buzz') Govt sets up panel to review and simplify E-Forms under Companies Act: Jaitley RBI willing to arm banks with more flexibility to recast bad corporate loans: Rajan I-T - Whether bifurcation of a sale transaction involving land and building into separate part is permissible for purpose of computation of capital gains - YES: HC (See '2014-TIOL-2052') Govt debt rises by 2.7% in Q2 (See 'Mixed Buzz') Cabinet to decide soon on merger of PIO and OCI Schemes (See 'Mixed Buzz') ACC clears key appointments - Rajive Kumar is New Shipping Secretary + Anjuly Chib Duggal goes as Spl Secy in MCA + Sunil Soni goes as Spl Secy in Ministry of Overseas Indian Affairs Ruckus in Lok Sabha over Black Money; Trinamool Congress MPs carry Umbrella with slogans - 'Bring Back Black Money' Trichy Customs seizes gold bars worth Rs 1.2 Crore smuggled through Lanka route ST - Appellant promoting products of foreign counterpart by way of advertising, marketing and consequently procuring orders for foreign supplier who delivers goods in India - service qualifies as export - Refund admissible: CESTAT (See 'Breaking News') Once appellant pays mandatory amount prescribed u/s 35F of CEA, 1944, no separate order of Stay is required for balance amount of demand (See 'DDT' Column) Income tax - Whether when assessee has received certain services and also accepted claims for same, such expenditure is not allowable u/s 37(1) merely because provisions were made close to AY and bills were not received - NO: HC (See 'Breaking News') Twenty Two Questions on GST (See 'ST se GST tak' Column) CENVAT - When there is no dispute regarding receipt of inputs, therefore, whatever tax has been paid by appellant on Inward Transportation Service is entitled for input service credit - Appeal allowed: CESTAT (See 'Breaking News') Government reiterates Instructions to babus on how to treat MPs (See 'DDT') Cus - Notf. 77/2008 is effective from 00 hours of 13/06/2008 - Since 'Let Export Order' has been given on 13/06/2008, rate of duty relevant for assessment would be rate prevalent on 13/06/2008 - Benefit available: CESTAT (See 'Breaking News') Delhi-Kathmandu-Delhi Bus Service to be flagged off today (See 'Mixed Buzz') Govt prescribes Uniform List of Services to be followed in SEZ (See 'SEZ') Govt looking for huge investment from private sector to provide rail link to all ports NSA Ajit Doval appointed as Special Envoy for border talks with China Former Petro Minister Murli Deora dies after protracted illness ST - unless there is control, which is passed to hirer under rent-a-cab scheme, there cannot be taxable transaction - Ratio of Punjab & Haryana High Court order differed with: HC (See 'Breaking News') Service Tax - Rent a cab- Difference Between Renting and Hiring - Kuldeep Singh case differed with (See 'DDT' Column) Cus - It is most unfortunate that Customs have not even cared to reply to any letter of appellant seeking refund consequent to Tribunal order - contempt proceedings to be initiated if amount not refunded: CESTAT (See 'Breaking News') Drawback - AIR or Brand Rate - No choice (See 'Guest' Column) Income tax - Whether when goods are loaded on ship and title with risk is passed on to assessee as per contract, assessee can claim deduction for loss if goods are not received - YES: HC (See 'Breaking News') Central Excise/Customs - Anti-Malarial Drugs Exempted (See 'DDT') Cus - Notfn. 158/95 - re-import - just because Commissioner has chosen to sit over appellant's request for extension, benefit of exemption cannot be denied: CESTAT (See 'Breaking News') Introduction of AADHAR Enabled Bio-metric Attendance System – babus will be forced to maintain punctuality (See 'DDT')
 
Bookmark and Share
Income tax - Sections 10A, 10B benefits cannot be denied when same have been allowed in previous AYs - Approval of SPTI Director sufficient to claim benefits: ITAT

By TIOL News Service

NEW DELHI, AUG 20, 2010: THE issue before the Tribunal is - Whether Revenue can deny Sec 10B benefits particularly when benefits have been allowed in the previous AYs and Whether Section 10B requires that for the purpose of establishing a STP unit, approval is required to be sought from the Board appointed by the central government u/s 14 of the Industries (Development & Regulation) Act, 1951. And the verdict has gone against the Revenue.

Facts of the case

The AO noted in the assessment order that the assessee has claimed deduction u/s 10B in the present year to the extent of Rs.170.17 lakhs. It is noted by the AO that in assessment year 2001-02 and 2002-03 no such deduction was claimed u/s 10B because there was business loss. In AY 03-04 & 2004- 05, the assessee has claimed deduction u/s 10B to the extent of Rs.159.44 lakhs and Rs.403.54 lakhs respectively. The AO has referred to Explanation –2 (iv) to section 10B as per which 100% EOU has been defined which are required to be approved as a 100% EOU by the Board appointed in this behalf by the Central Govt. in exercise of the powers conferred by section 14 of the Industries (Development & Regulation) Act, 1951 and the rules made under that Act. The AO asked the assessee to furnish a copy of statutory approval as 100% EOU. In reply, the assessee has submitted a copy of acknowledgement dated 27.10.1994 of filing the memorandum for the manufacturing of certain items canvassing it to be a Board approval. It is further noted by the AO that the assessee has filed a copy of approval dated 16.11.1998 granted within the meaning 100% EOU under EHTP Scheme issued by the Dy. Director (Tech.) of STPI (an Autonomous Body), Department of Electronics, Govt. of India, Noida. The AO has referred to a Tribunal decision rendered in the case of Infotech Enterprises Ltd. v. JCIT wherein it was held that STP unit cannot automatically be regarded as a 100% EOU.

By following this Tribunal decision, it was held by the AO that in the absence of specific approval by the Board within section 10B, Explanation-2 (iv) of the Act, the claim of deduction u/s 10B is not allowable to the assessee company and on this basis, he rejected the claim of the assessee for deduction u/s 10B of the Act. An alternative claim was also made before the AO for allowing deduction u/s 10A but the same was also rejected by the AO on the basis that the assessee company’s approval under EHTP Scheme, is dated 16.11.1998 whereas as per the requirement of section 10A, the assessee was required to commence manufacturing or producing computer software on or after 1.4.1994. Being aggrieved, the assessee carried the matter in appeal before CIT(A) who has decided the issue regarding allowing of deduction u/s 10B in favour of the assessee and the revenue is in appeal against the order of  CIT(A).

The revenue contended that since there is no approval from Board as required as per Explanation 2(iv) to section 10B, deduction is not allowable to the assessee u/s 10B.

Having heard both the parties the Tribunal held that,

++ as per the order of CIT(A), this issue has been decided on the basis of Instruction No.1 dated 31.3.2006 issued by CBDT and Minutes of Industrial Ministerial Communication vide letter dated 23.3.2006 issued by the Ministry of Communication and Technology. Vide Notification No.4 (RE-95/92-97) dated 30.4.1995, issued by the Director General (Foreign Trade), Ministry of Commence, in exercise of powers conferred in sub section (1) of section 3 of Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992 notified the amended STP Scheme provides that the scheme is administered by the Department of Electronics, Govt. of India, through Directors of respective STPs which form part of the STPI, a society registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860. An application in the prescribed format for establishing a STP unit may be submitted to the Chief Executive of STP Complex along with the details of the software project. Such application will be considered by an Inter Ministerial Standing Committee constituted under the Chairmanship of Secretary, Department of Electronics.

++ copy of registration papers of the appellant filed before the AO clearly shows that STPI is duly authorized authority on behalf of Inter Ministerial Standing Committee to grant registration of the units under the scheme of STPI. Copy of clarification obtained from STPI in this connection has also been perused. It shows that the registration has been granted by Director, STPI on behalf of Inter Ministerial Standing Committee. The CBDT has issued instruction No.1/2006 dated 31.3.2006 on this issue that benefit u/s 10A should not be denied to the assessee only on the ground that registration has been granted by Directors of Software Technology Parks;

++ reliance was placed on the Tribunal decision rendered in the case of ITO v. Regancy Cresations Ltd. Where it was held that registration granted by STPI for setting up of 100% EOU under Software Technology Park Scheme is valid for allowing deduction u/s 10B;

++ Since the facts are identical in the present case, this Tribunal decision rendered in the case of regency Creations Ltd. is directly applicable in the present case and the STIP registration granted to the assessee on 16.11.1998 is valid for allowing deduction to the assessee u/s 10B and hence the order of the CIT(A) on this issue is upheld;

++ in an earlier year i.e. assessment year 2004-05, the AO himself has allowed deduction u/s 10B to the assessee in a scrutiny assessment. It is also not brought on record by the revenue that this order is revised u/s 263 or reopened u/s 147. Under these facts, having decided in AY 2004-05 that the assessee is eligible for deduction u/s 10B, it cannot be denied in this subsequent year on the basis that the assessee is not a 100% EOU for the reason that necessary approval is not with the assessee. This is against the rule of consistency. For this reason also, there is no need to interfere in the order of CIT (A).

Revenue’s appeal dismissed.

(See 2010-TIOL-452-ITAT-DEL in 'Income Tax')


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   
 
 
TIOL Mobile App
TIOL SEARCH
 
TIOL Subscriptions
 All-In-One Package
 Indirect Tax Package
 Income Tax Package
<< More Packages>>
 
   
             
Income Tax Customs Excise Service Tax FEMA DGFT SEZ Misc Pitara Budget
  • Notifications
  • Circulars
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • ITAT Cases
  • Instructions
  • Advance Ruling
  • Settlement
  • Other Case
  • Directorate of Income Tax (Systems)
  • Tariff Notfn
  • Non Tariff Notfn
  • Circulars
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • Cestat Cases
  • Settlement
  • Advance Ruling
  • Safeguard Duty Notfn
  • Anti-dumping Notfn
  • Drawback Cases
  • Tariff Notfn
  • Non Tariff Notfn
  • Circulars
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • Cestat Cases
  • Settlement
  • Advance Ruling
  • Excise Amendment
  • Clean Energy Cess Notfn
  • MISC Circulars
  • 37B Order
  • Commr.(A) Order
  • CESTAT
  • Notifications
  • Circulars
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • Cestat Cases
  • Miscellaneous
  • Advance Ruling
  • FAQ
  • Finance Act, 1994
  • Commr. (A) Orders
  • 37B Order
  • Removal of Difficulty
  • VCES
  • Accounting Head
  • Exchange Manual
  • Fema Notifications
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • RBI Notifications
  • Act
  • Rules
  • Regulations
  • Master Circulars
  • RBI Circulars
  • Depository Scheme
  • Notifications
  • Circulars
  • Public Notices
  • Trade Notice
  • FTDR Amendment 2010
  • MISC
  • State Acts
  • Notifications
  • Instructions
  • Act 2005
  • Rules 2006
  • DGEP
  • State Policy
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • VAT Cases
  • Deputation Posts
  • Service News
  • The Insider
  • Transfer
  • Promotion
  • Recruitment Rules
  • Transfer Policy
  • Training Circulars
  • Service Cases
  • MISC
  • Pay Commission
  • Cadre Review
  • Budget Circular 2013-14
  • Union Budgets
  • Economic Surveys
  • Budget Speeches
  • Finance Acts
  • Finance Bill
  • TRU - D. O. Letter
  • A Taxindiaonline Website. Copyright © 2014 Taxindiaonline.com Pvt.Ltd. All rights reserved. | Powered by 4th Dimension