News Update

Kolkata DRI seizes 12.4 kg elephant tusk being smuggled from Assam to NepalDigital India successing becoz of people's pull: PMFish eats plastic & humans eat fish - serious health hazard: MinisterI-T - When assessee was only a licensee, not having exclusive rights over a property, vide unregistered document, it cannot claim to be owner of property for purpose of Sec 22: HCRailways relaxes upper age limit for Group C postsIndia to create digital health platform for better service delivery: NaddaST/CX - No vested right exists to avail benefit of unutilized amount of EC or SHE credit - Article 14 is not offended - Petition dismissed: HCIndian delegation promotes cinema in European Film MarketNo GST is leviable on goods sold/transferred while remaining in Customs bonded warehouseI-T - If assessee-society enters into contract with State Govt to cook & supply mid-day meals at schools, such activity is not necessarily in nature of trade and business: HCLeviability of IGST and as well as Compensation cess under Customs ActCX - CENVAT -Since Respondent's factory occupied 95% of factory area, they are entitled for 95% of total CENVAT credit on common input services: CESTATTripura elections - 75% voter turnout recordedIndia has potential to do much better, says FM in RiyadhIranian Plane Crash - 66 pax feared killedAG expresses concern over CBEC cases being dismissed by SC on ground of delayTime to shift focus from acronyms to gaps in performanceGST - Industry reports cumbersome procedures & high cost of complianceFICCI Survey finds compression in cost of funds indexDomestic air travel registers 20% growth in January, 2018Globalisation Index - India loses 16 places to rank 78India, Iran sign MoU to set up Expert Group on Trade Remedy MeasuresIndia to launch Chandrayaan-2 in AprilGST - Many States want GST Council to discuss inclusion of real estate at next meetingSeaports located at Dhamra Port and Dighi Port included for availing export promotion benefits under Chapter 4 of FTPGovt working on formulation of National Automotive PolicyCBEC accepts 63 Court Orders to reduce litigationTax Season Has Started, Here's Your To-Do List for This SeasonGST: Death of the Salesman?
 
Service tax on GTAs : Make it 2.5 per cent with no strings attached

By TIOL Edit Team

SERVICE Tax on Goods Transport Agency has come into effect from 1st Jan 2005, with a number of Notifications issued by the MoF on various issues. After one month of experience, it is worthwhile to review the difficulties faced by all those concerned with the policy decision. Given the fact that the Goods Transport Agents were up in arms against this levy on them, the Government followed the recommendations of the Bhardwaj Committee and shifted the liability of paying Tax from the GTAs to either consignors or consignees. This peculiar concept of making the recipient of the Service liable to pay tax has created serious problems for the taxpayers.

As per Rule 2(1)(d)(v) of the Service Tax Rules, the consignee or consignor falling under the categories specified therein is liable to pay the tax. But the amount of tax to be paid is governed by the Notification 32/2004 dated 3.12.2004. This Notification exempts 75% of the gross amount charged from service tax, subject to the condition that no credit shall be availed on the inputs/capital goods used under the provisions of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 for providing such taxable service. If the gross amount paid is Rs 100, the duty liability under this notification would be Rs 2.5 (10% on Rs 25). Thus, the effective tax liability would be at 2.5% on the gross amount charged (for the sake of brevity, education cess is ignored). This amount has to be assessed by the consignee or consignor and the condition of “not availing the credit” has to be fulfilled by the GTA! How can the consignor or consignee ensure that the GTA stationed at a far off place has taken credit or not? So the consignors/consignees who are willing to take registration and pay tax are in utter confusion as to whether they can avail the benefit of Notification 32/2004 or not and also how it is possible for them to ensure that the GTA has not availed any credit. And what is the machinery available to check this?

And, what would happen if the consignor /consignee pays 2.5% tax and the GTA takes credit without the knowledge of the consignee/consignor? Can the department ask them to pay 10% instead of 2.5% from the consignor/consignee for a violation by the GTA on which they have no control? Going by the past experience in input credit disputes, it is all likely that the consignor /consignee cannot be penalized for the violation on part of the GTA.

But, why there should be such condition in the Notification? Obviously no inputs are required for providing the Service of a GTA ( HSD and MS are excluded from the definition of inputs). The only item they can take credit is perhaps a one time excise duty paid on a Truck. But that would make not only their consignee/consignors not entitled for exemption under Notification 32/2004 , but also the GTA himself, in cases where the GTA is liable to pay service tax. Between the options of paying service tax at full rate by availing onetime credit on the Truck, and paying only 2.5% by not availing the credit, more and more GTA s would choose only the later option.

Instead of the above, it is better that the Government exclude the GTAs from the purview of Cenvat Credit and make the tax effective at 2.5% across the board and give wide publicity. A tax rate at 2.5% is not a very horrifying and perhaps this kind of presentation would make more and more assessees voluntarily contribute to the kitty and thus make this difficult task of taxing the truckers a smooth ride. Perhaps North Block needs to borrow a few marketing strategies from the corporate houses too!


 RECENT DISCUSSION(S) POST YOUR COMMENTS
   
 
Sub: Service tax on GTAs Make it 2 5 per cent with no strings attached

Sir,


I am working in manufacturing industry and we are purchasing raw material through transport like AFL Logistics,Gatti Cargo and we are paying freight charges but the transporter himself collected the freight charges and with service tax.

We are registered with Service tax dept in GTA service.Dept asking to pay service tax for freight.But Transporter also charging service tax.

Kindly reply



Posted by ramesh ramesh