Taxindiaonline.com - Daily Mail Update
 
2010-TIOL-NEWS-067
Sunday, March 21, 2010
 
News Flash

Airlines authorities detect crude bomb in Kingfisher aircraft;

Govt issues guidelines to curb age fraud in sports;

IGL hikes CNG price by 50 paise;

India-UK DTAA - Applicant is member of E&Y Global - gets access to central resources and also support services from non-resident entity - reimburses costs - Since relationship does not involve any transfer of technical knowhow or skill, it is not taxable: AAR (See 'Breaking News' + '2010-TIOL-18-ARA-IT')

Mr S M Bhatnagar is new Joint Secretary (Customs); CBEC issues order;

Impact of recessions on M & A phenomenon in India! (See 'Breaking News')

     
 

Dear Member,

Sending the following files:

 
     
Common Basket

TIOL COMMENTARY

editorial.pdf

Vox populi awaits Pranab Da's debt cut roadmap;

article4.pdf

Time changing but Real Estate needs to be cautious!

story.pdf

Impact of recessions on M & A phenomenon in India!

MIXED BUZZ

mbuzz1408.pdf

CBI Director calls for close cooperation between investigators and law officers;

mbuzz1407.pdf

Innovation: Govts should do more to help SMEs, says OECD;

mbuzz1406.pdf

Cabinet approves revival of National Jute Manufactures Corporation;

mbuzz1405.pdf

Biosafety Regulatory Framework is in place: Govt;

mbuzz1404.pdf

Cabinet okays creation of National Population Register;

mbuzz1403.pdf

Five members nominated to Council of States;

   
Direct Tax Basket

2010-TIOL-139-ITAT-DEL

DCIT, New Delhi Vs M/s Vestargaard Frendsen (India) Pvt Ltd (Dated: February 12, 2010)

Income Tax - AO treats the commission payment as bogus and makes additions - CIT (A) deletes it - Held, issue should also go back to the file of the AO for a fresh decision and the Assessee should furnish the confirmation from the Agencies and should also explain the discrepancy in the amount of sales.

AO rejects the claim of the Assessee regarding bad debts on the basis that the provisions of sec. 36(2) are not complied with - CIT(A) accepts this claim of the Assessee - Held, the CIT(A) has rightly accepted the claim of the Assessee that the two amounts are allowable as business loss. Revenue ground rejected. : DELHI ITAT;

2010-TIOL-18-ARA-IT + ey story.pdf

Ernst & Young (P) Ltd (Dated : March 19, 2010)

Income tax - Sec 9(1)(vii) - India-UK DTAA - Article 7, 13 - Applicant is a private limited company, engaged in providing consultancy services - applicant is a member of Ernst & Young Global which has member entities in various countries - Ernst & Young EMEIA Services Ltd is one of such entities incorporated under the laws of England and Wales - this non-resident entity provides support in various fields, and the costs incurred are allocated to all EY members and they reimburse it - whether the payments made by the applicant are fees for technical services under Article 13 of the DTAA - whether the sum receivable by the Ernst & Young EMEIA Services Ltd are fees for technical services u/s 9(1)(vii) of the I-T Act

Ernst & Young EMEIA Services provides support in various fields such as Area, Global and Market Development etc. to all the member entities of the EY organization so that they may gain access to standardized human, financial and other resources to ensure that consistent, high quality professional services are provided to the client base of all members of the EY organization. EMEIA, inter alia, provides Area Services, Market Development Support Services and Global Services as detailed in the Schedule to the Area Services and Market Development Agreement. Such support is provided from UK and it does not have any Permanent Establishment or fixed base in India. The terms and conditions under which all EY member entities would get such support from EMEIA are documented in the form of the Area Services and Market Development Agreement (for short, ‘the Agreement') which has been filed. Under the Agreement, costs incurred for providing the services are allocated to EY member entities and they reimburse such costs to EMEIA, UK. : AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING;

   
Indirect Tax Basket

SERVICE TAX SECTION

2010-TIOL-433-CESTAT-KOL

M/s Thriveni Earthmovers Pvt Ltd Vs CCE & ST, Bhubaneswar-II (Dated: February 1, 2010)

Appellant entering into contract with Tata Iron & Steel for providing service relating to excavation and transportation of Run of Nine (RON) - Transportation of goods is within the mining area – Revenue raising and confirming a service tax demand of Rs.1.24 Crores on the ground that appellant providing Business Auxiliary Service and Cargo Handling Service – CESTAT in the case of CCE,vs. B.K.Thakkar (2008-TIOL-148-CESTAT-KOL) has held that transportation within the mining area is part of mining activity and hence, the assessee is not separately liable to pay Service Tax – Strong prima facie case in favour as the Contract is for mining, and 'Mining Service' comes under the scope of Service Tax w.e.f.01.06.2007 - present demand is prior to this period – Waiver of pre -deposit of the amount of Service Tax, interest and penalty - Stay Petition allowed. : CHENNAI CESTAT;

2010-TIOL-429-CESTAT-AHM

M/s Modern Petrofils Vs CCE, Vadodara (Dated: February 5, 2010)

ST - Cenvat Credit of ST paid on GTA services for outward freight from factory to port of export - Revenue argues that the point of removal can only be the factory or a warehouse or a depot - Assessee treats port as place of removal - held, in view of the Larger Bench decision in the case of ABB Ltd the case is settled in favour of the assessee and the fact that the Karnataka HC has stayed the decision will not make any impact - Revenue's appeal dismissed : AHEMDABAD CESTAT;

 

 

CENTRAL EXCISE SECTION

2010-TIOL-432-CESTAT-BANG

CCE, Hyderabad-I Vs M/s Agarwal Rubber Pvt Ltd & Others (Dated: January 12, 2009)

Central Excise – SSI exemption – clubbing of clearances of different units and denying exemption – revenue has not controverted findings of the adjudicating authority in allowing the exemption – Mere financial accommodation in form of loans, would not by itself be construed as pervasive financial control exercised by one company over other – the order of the adjudicating authority upheld. : BANGALORE CESTAT;

2010-TIOL-431-CESTAT-MAD.pdf

M/s Alfomega Enterprises Private Limited Vs CCE, COIMBATORE (Dated: November 20, 2009)

Central Excise – Penalty – non-payment of duty when the inputs on which credit had been availed were cleared as defective – the assessee had raised necessary invoices showing the details such as value, amount of duty payable on the defective inputs, yet did not pay the duty – charge of
suppression stands established – Penalty under Section 11 AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944 rightly imposed. : CHENNAI CESTAT;

 

 

CUSTOMS SECTION

2010-TIOL-176-HC-MAD-NDPS + ndps story.pdf

L. Sundhuskhan Vs State Rep. By The Superintendent Of Customs (Dated : February 5, 2010)

NDPS Act – punishment for possession of morphine / heroine – punishment structure based on the quantity of the drug – it is only the actual content of the drug / substance present in the offending goods, but not the total weight of the goods which is relevant for determining the punishment – Since the content of the drug / substance is only 10% of the 380 gms of the material seized, the appellant is punishable under Section 21(b) of the NDPS Act, 1985, but not under Section 21(c). : MADRAS HIGH COURT ;

2010-TIOL-430-CESTAT-MAD

M/s Meena Leather Exports Vs CC, Chennai (Dated: November 11, 2009)

Customs – drawback – burnishable upper finished leather is finished leather although a lesser protective coat with dye/pigment was applied – confiscation and penalty set aside. :CHENNAI CESTAT;

     
 

Regards
Customercare Executive

Taxindiaonline.com Pvt. Ltd.
Unit No. 1, 2nd Floor, Vasant Arcade,
Nelson Mandela Road, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi-70
Tel. +91-11-2613-9742
TeleFax. +91-11-2613-9743
Web: http: //www.taxindiaonline.com
Email: updates@taxindiaonline.com
____________________________
CONFIDENTIALITY/PROPRIETARY NOTE.
The Document accompanying this electronic transmission contains information from Taxindiaonline.com Pvt. Ltd.,which is confidential, proprietary or copyrighted and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named on this transmission. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. This prohibition includes, without limitation, displaying this transmission or any portion thereof, on any public bulletin board. If you are not the intended recipient of this document, please return this document to Taxindiaonline.com Pvt. Ltd. immediately.