CENTRAL EXCISE SECTION
CIRCULAR
excircular918.pdf
Implementation of the provisions of COTP Act, 2003 and The Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products (Packaging and Labelling) Rules, 2008- Empowering the Customs & Central Excise Officers - regarding;
excircular917.pdf
Export warehousing Extension of facility at Gautam Budh Nagar in the state of Utter Pradesh and Nagpur in the state of Maharashtra - regarding;
excircular916.pdf
Leviability of cess on tractors under Tractor Cess Rules, 1992-reg;
CASE LAWS
2010-TIOL-352-CESTAT-MAD.pdf
M/s Rane Trw Steering Systems Ltd Vs CCE, Trichy (Dated: November 23, 2009)
Central Excise CENVAT Credit catering service is eligible for credit in view of the Larger Bench decision in case of M/s GTC Industries reported in 2008-TIOL-1634-CESTAT-MUM-LB:CHENNAI CESTAT;
2010-TIOL-351-CESTAT-AHM.pdf
M/s Rama Newsprint & Papers Ltd Vs CCE, Surat-II (Dated: December 3, 2009)
Central Excise - Exempted and dutiable goods - Reversal of credit - News print in reels vis-à-vis news print in rolls - Rule 6(3 )( a) & Rule 6(3)(b) of Cenvat Credit Rules - Newsprint in reels is covered by CETH 4801 even though heading reads "newsprints in rolls and sheets". Hence Rule 6(3 )( a) of Cenvat Credit Rules are applicable. It is sufficient if the appellants reverse the credit attributable to the inputs used in the exempted products. Provisions of Rule 6(3 )( b) of Cenvat Credit Rules are not attracted. (Para 5 & 6):AHMEDABAD CESTAT;
2010-TIOL-350-CESTAT-DEL.pdf
M/s Kamal Casting Vs CCE, Chandigarh (Dated: September 16, 2009)
Central Excise - CENVAT - Irregular Credit - Goods not received - Dealers invoices - Penalty - Statements of recipient of cenvatable invoices prove that goods were not received as also from the statement of registered dealers. As duty has been demanded and penalty imposed on the beneficiary, penalty reduced to 10% of the penalty imposed. ; (Para 5, 6 & 7):DELHI CESTAT;
2010-TIOL-349-CESTAT-MUM.pdf + miltech story.pdf
Militech Industriies Pvt Ltd Vs CCE, Nagpur (Dated: January 12, 2010)
Clearance of Parts and accessories of Arms and ammunition without payment of Special Excise duty - Confusion in the Budget Speech resulted in such non-payment No ingredients for imposition of penalty u/s 11AC of the CEA, 1944 CESTAT
When the goods are not available or had not been cleared under bond, redemption fine cannot be imposed Appeal allowed:MUMBAI CESTAT;
CUSTOMS SECTION
DGFT PUBLIC NOTICE
dgft09pn048.pdf
DGFT clarifies on Indo-China Border trade;
dgft09pn047.pdf
DGFT makes amendment in Annexure A relating to SION;
CASE LAWS
2010-TIOL-347-CESTAT-MAD.pdf
Fortune Textiles Company Vs CC, Chennai (Dated: December 18, 2009)
Customs Machine meant for the customer at Mumbai wrongly dispatched to the appellants at Chennai who requested for cancellation of Bill of Entry and refund of Customs duty paid Once the appellants came to know that the goods were not meant for them, they were required to challenge the assessments as this is not case falling under the provisions of Section 149 or Section 154 of the Customs Act, 1962 Impugned order upheld:CHENNAI CESTAT;