SERVICE TAX SECTION
2010-TIOL-99-CESTAT-AHM.pdf
CST, Ahmedabad Vs M/s Purnima Advertising & Promotion Pvt Ltd (Dated : November 6, 2009) Service Tax - Advertising Service - refund - the service provided by the appellants is only in respect of booking the space or time and is taxable under Business Auxiliary Service, but not under Advertising Agency service - the assessee paid service tax on the gross amount without considering the discount of 12% offered by the client - the assessee is entitled for refund of the excess amount paid - claim for the period beyond 25.1.2004 is hit by limitation under Section 11 B.
Unjust enrichment - the issue of credit note is sufficient for claiming the refund from the department. :AHMEDABAD CESTAT;
2010-TIOL-95-CESTAT-DEL.pdf
CCE, Kanpur Vs M/s Vishal Cable Network (Dated : October 20, 2009)
Service Tax - Penalty - Cable operator service - irregular availment of CENVAT Credit by the MSO of the amount paid by the subscriber cable operator - no reason to interfere with the Commissioner (Appeals) order vacating the penalties by invoking Section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994.:DELHI CESTAT; 2010-TIOL-94-CESTAT-MAD.pdf
M/s Kannappa Corpn Vs CCE, Trichy (Dated : October 9, 2009) Service Tax Cargo handling Service If someone hires labour for loading/unloading of goods in their individual capacity, he will not be liable to service tax as cargo handling agent.:CHENNAI CESTAT;
CENTRAL EXCISE SECTION
2010-TIOL-101-CESTAT-AHM.pdf + gabbar story.pdf
M/s Gabbar Engineering Company Vs CCE, Ahmedabad (Dated : August 28, 2009)
Central Excise Non-portable bag closer machine and industrial sewing machine which have motors connected externally by v-belt and pulley eligible for exemption Notification 6/2002-CE Position adopted by department in r/o a draft audit para and decision taken by CC's Conference being similar and in favour of allowing exemption benefits, Revenue cannot take a different stand Portable bag closer machines with integrated motors not eligible for exemption Classification aspect of portable bag closer machines not answered as it was not under consideration before original authority Manufacture and clearance of crank shafts and waste & scrap generated during process of manufacture liable for duty Levy of penalties set aside as it involves interpretation of exemption notification Matter remanded to re-determine eligibility of SSI exemption benefit, re-quantification of duty liability :AHMEDABAD CESTAT; 2010-TIOL-100-CESTAT-BANG.pdf
M/s Karanja Industries Bidar Vs CCE, Belgaum (Dated : July 14, 2009) Central Excise Availment of exemption benefit in terms of S.No. 86 and 86A of Notification 6/2002-CE simultaneously Condition No.14A thereof does not put any restriction on availment of benefit under S. No. 86A if the assessee had already availed benefit under Sl. No.86 Impugned order set aside :BANGALORE CESTAT;
2010-TIOL-97-CESTAT-MAD.pdf
M/s Ponni Sugars (Erode) Ltd Vs CCE, Salem (Dated : October 22, 2009)
Central Excise CENVAT Credit credit is admissible on steel plates and angles used for manufacture of storage tanks.:CHENNAI CESTAT;
2010-TIOL-96-CESTAT-BANG.pdf
M/s Hindustan Cables Ltd Vs CCE, Hyderabad (Dated : June 16, 2009)
Central Excise Refund When provisional assessments are finalized, refund claim of excess duty paid is not hit by limitation Impugned order denying refund unsustainable, liable to be set aside:BANGALORE CESTAT;
CUSTOMS SECTION
2010-TIOL-98-CESTAT-MAD.pdf
Sethu Samudhra Shipping Services Vs CC, Tuticorin (Dated : October 6, 2009)
Customs Smuggling of Red Sanders - Nothing comes out from the statements recorded about the involvement of any of the three appellants in the attempt to smuggle out red sanders - Failure to discharge duties as required under the Customs House Agents Licensing Regulations may lead to action under those Regulations but certainly cannot lead to a conclusion from the evidences that they aided and abetted in the attempt to export red sanders - There is no evidence of any action (commission) or inaction (omission) on their part so as to render any goods liable to confiscation, in order to attract the provisions of Section 114 against them. :CHENNAI CESTAT;
2010-TIOL-93-CESTAT-BANG.pdf
M/s OM Shanti Satins Ltd Vs CC & CCE, Hyderabad (Dated : March 24, 2009)
Customs 100% EOU Clearance of grey cotton fabrics against AROs issued in terms of DFRCs in DTA Clearances against DFRCs not included in DTA permission granted by DC, cannot be categorized as goods allowed to be sold in India' Proviso to Notification 125/84-CE excludes clearances which are allowed to be sold in India' In terms of Para 7.7 of EXIM Policy, supply of goods to DFRC holders is considered as deemed exports and eligible for exemption under Notification 125/84-CE Demand of duty not sustainable, liable to be set aside :BANGALORE CESTAT; |