SERVICE TAX SECTION
2009-TIOL-1388-CESTAT-BANG.pdf
M/s Raja Ratnaiah & Co Vs CST, Mysore (Dated: May 27, 2009) Service Tax – Activity of meter reading, billing and ledger keeping whether taxable as professional services of CAs or BAS - Full waiver of pre-deposit in view of financial hardship:BANGLORE CESTAT; 2009-TIOL-1387-CESTAT-DEL.pdf Ghanshyam Lodhwal Vs CCE, Jaipur-I (Dated: June 17, 2009)
ST - Penalty - Assessee rents out vehicle and the vehicle stays with the hirer - demand raised - held, given that smallness of the demand and the fact that the assessee cooperated with the adjudicating authority, penalty is not called for but this case is not to be cited as precedent :DELHI CESTAT; 2009-TIOL-1386-CESTAT-MUM.pdf Cummins Generator Technologies India Ltd Vs CCE & CC, Aurangabad (Dated: June 23, 2009)
Credit of service tax paid on outdoor catering service - issue is covered by the Larger Bench decision in GTC Industries Ltd. 2008-TIOL-1634-CESTAT-MUM-LB – Cenvat admissible - Appeal allowed.:MUMBAI
CESTAT;
CENTRAL EXCISE SECTION
CIRCULAR
excircular897.pdf
Liability
of interest where CENVAT credit was wrongly taken but reversed
by assessee before utilization; CASE LAWS
2009-TIOL-1392-CESTAT-MUM.pdf + nagpur story.pdf
M/s Nagpur Transwell Power Pvt Ltd Vs CC & CCE, Nagpur (Dated: July 10, 2009)
Law does not provide for an appeal against self assessment – if this be so, refund claim sanctioned is proper – Stay of recovery ordered by CESTAT.:MUMBAI CESTAT; 2009-TIOL-1391-CESTAT-AHM.pdf
CCE, Vapi Vs M/s T & D Galiakot Pvt Ltd (Dated: March 3, 2009) Central Excise – Refund of excess interest paid erroneously allowed as such amount not recovered from customers – Concept of unjust enrichment for interest introduced only by way of amendment to Section 11B through Finance Act, 2008 and effective prospectively – Impugned order upheld:AHMEDABAD CESTAT; 2009-TIOL-1390-CESTAT-BANG.pdf
CCE & CC, Guntur Vs M/s PMG Structurals Pvt Ltd (Dated: December 19, 2008)
Central Excise – Pre-engineered building structures cleared in unassembled condition from factory classifiable under Chapter 9406 – Impugned order of lower authorities upheld – No merit in Revenue appeals:BANGLORE CESTAT;
CUSTOMS SECTION
2009-TIOL-1385-CESTAT-BANG.pdf
M/s NCS Sugars Limited Vs CC & CCE, Visakhapatnam (Dated: May 15, 2009)
Customs – Export of sugar by third party in accordance with export release order by Directorate of Sugar and EXIM policy provisions – Documents evidencing realization of export proceeds in r/o advance licenses – Prima facie case in favour of appellants – Full waiver of pre-deposit and stay granted:BANGLORE CESTAT; 2009-TIOL-1384-CESTAT-MAD.pdf
Sanmar Speciality Chemicals Ltd Vs CC, Chennai (Dated: April 8, 2009)
Customs – warehoused goods - rate of duty applicable on expiry of warehousing period - in the case of goods removed from a warehouse under Section 68 after the expiry of the warehousing period, the rate of duty applicable would be the rate in force on the date of actual removal of the goods from the warehouse.:CHENNAI CESTAT;
|