SERVICE TAX SECTION
2009-TIOL-1265-CESTAT-AHM.pdf
M/s Indo-Japan Pen Manufacturing Co Pvt Ltd Vs CCE, Vapi (Dated: July 9, 2009)
ST - assessee pays tax on royalty - claims refund based on a Tribunal's decision - Commissioner(A) remands the issue for examining the unjust enrichment aspect of the case - held, Commissioner(A) order asking for examination of unjust enrichment is valid but there is no merit in observation that the Tribunal's orders are orders in personnem and not orders in rem.: AHMEDABAD
CESTAT;
2009-TIOL-1264-CESTAT-AHM.pdf
M/s Kabisco Food Industries Vs CCE, Ahmedabad-II (Dated: June 18, 2009)
Service Tax – Credit on outward transportation available in view of LB decision in ABB Ltd & Ors 2009-TIOL-830-CESTAT-BANG-(LB) – Matter remanded to Commissioner (Appeals) for a fresh decision in light of LB decision.: AHMEDABAD
CESTAT;
2009-TIOL-1263-CESTAT-AHM.pdf
CCE, Surat Vs M/s Mahadev Cable Net (Dated: June 4, 2009)
ST - Cable service - Assessee pays tax with interest before issue of SCN - penalty - Commissioner(A) reduces the same - held, as noted by the Commissioner(A) that the assessee had not collected tax from customers but paid the tax with interest and 25% of penalty, it is a fit case for invocation of Sec 80 - Revenue's appeal dismissed.: AHMEDABAD
CESTAT;
CENTRAL EXCISE SECTION
2009-TIOL-1269-CESTAT-AHM.pdf + cable story.pdf
M/s Sanghvi Aerospace Pvt Ltd Vs CCE, Ahmedabad (Dated: June 25, 2009)
Member (Technical):
Central Excise – Clearance of wires and cables specially designed for aircrafts, satellite launch vehicles and battle tanks – Eligible for benefit of Notification No. 10/97-CE but not Notification 6/2002-CE and Notification No. 64/95-CE – Since appellant is eligible for one of the exemption notifications, exemption benefit allowed and impugned order set aside
Member (Judicial):
Central Excise – Clearance of wires and cables specially designed for aircrafts, satellite launch vehicles and battle tanks – Eligible for benefit of exemption Notification 10/97-CE – Since Commissioner disallowed benefit of either notifications, appeal allowed in totality in view of eligibility of exemption notification 10/97-CE and extension of the same by Member (Technical) – No comments on Technical Member's disallowance of Notification 6/2002-CE – No difference of opinion.: AHMEDABAD
CESTAT;
2009-TIOL-1268-CESTAT-MAD.pdf
CCE, Chennai-II Vs M/s Caterpillar India Pvt Ltd (Dated: April 1, 2009)
Central Excise – CENVAT Credit – inputs removed as such – the respondent was required to pay an amount equal to the credit availed in respect of inputs or capital goods at the time of their removal as such – entitled for refund of excess duty paid – matter remanded to examine from the angle of unjust enrichment.: CHENNAI
CESTAT;
2009-TIOL-1267-CESTAT-DEL.pdf
M/s Indo Micronutrients Vs CCE, Indore (Dated: May 6, 2009)
Central Excise – Order for payment of pre-deposit not complied with, appeal liable for dismissal due to non-compliance with provisions of Section 35F.: DELHI
CESTAT;
2009-TIOL-1266-CESTAT-MUM.pdf
M/s Semco Electric Pvt Ltd Vs CC & CCE, Pune-I (Dated: June 10, 2009)
Export of goods – Theft of goods from containers – applicant has lodged a complaint and made a claim for insurance - no case for grant of waiver of the duty demanded – financial hardship pleaded - prima-facie case for grant of waiver of amount of interest and penalty.: MUMBAI CESTAT;
CUSTOMS SECTION
2009-TIOL-1271-CESTAT-MAD.pdf + deec story.pdf
M/s Areva T&D India Ltd Vs CC, Mumbai (Dated: April 15, 2009)
Customs - conversion of free shipping bills to DEEC Shipping Bills - the appellants have established that the link between the imported goods and exported products – order of the Commissioner rejecting the conversion is set aside.: CHENNAI CESTAT; 2009-TIOL-1270-CESTAT-MAD.pdf
CC,Tuticorin Vs Dhruv International (Dated: March 30, 2009)
Customs – secondhand photo copiers – import of secondhand photocopiers allowed without licence prior to 19.10.2005 – revenue appeal has no merit.: CHENNAI CESTAT; |