SERVICE TAX SECTION
2009-TIOL-1262-CESTAT-KOL.pdf
M/s Sainik Mining & Allied Service Ltd Vs CCE, CC & CST, BBSR II (Dated: May 12, 2009)
ST - Cargo Handling Service - assessee enters into contracts with coalfields authorities for extraction and transfer of coal, mechanical transfer and transportation of coal for further processing and hiring of pay loaders - held, the first demand was rightly dropped by the Commissioner(A) as it was mining service and the second demand was ruled in favour of the assessee but the third demand as per the Tribunal's decision in another case goes in favour of the Revenue - A pre-deposit of Rs 11 lakh ordered.: KOLKATA CESTAT; 2009-TIOL-1258-CESTAT-DEL.pdf
M/s Korea Plant Service & Engineering Co Ltd Vs CCE, Jaipur I (Dated: July 9, 2009)
ST - Cenvat Credit - Assessee enters into contract for operation and maintenance of captive power plant - pays service on the entire contract amount - avails credit for paying tax on car hiring charges, insurance expenses, security services and coal unloading charges - Commissioner(A) disallows the credit - held, in view of the Tribunal's decision in a similar case, granting unconditional stay, waiver from pre-deposit granted.: DELHI CESTAT;
2009-TIOL-1255-CESTAT-DEL.pdf
M/s Swaraj Mazda Ltd Vs CCE, Jalandhar (Dated: June 11, 2009)
ST - Condonation of Delay - Commissioner(A) rejects the appeal for lack of COD application - also relies on Department of Post's Chitizen's Charters which states that the delivery through Speed Post takes 1-3 days, depending on destination - held, Commissioner(A) passed the order without going into the merit of the case - case remanded.: DELHI
CESTAT;
CENTRAL EXCISE SECTION
2009-TIOL-1261-CESTAT-MUM.pdf + entry story.pdf
M/s Narsingirji Mills Vs CCE, Pune (Dated: February 20, 2009)
Entry 52.7 to Notification 8/96-CE covers cotton fabrics simpliciter - if the process of calendering of cotton fabrics is considered as not amounting to manufacture, then the entry 52.15 to notification 8/96-CE would become otiose and meaningless Duty demand upheld CESTAT
Appellant admitting that they do not fulfill the condition mentioned in Sr. no. 52.15 of Notification 8/96-CE Cotton fabrics subjected to the process of calendering is not exempted as condition not satisfied CESTAT upholds demand of duty and rejects appeal.: MUMBAI CESTAT;
2009-TIOL-1257-CESTAT-BANG.pdf
CCE, Bang III Vs M/s HVAC Systems Pvt Ltd (Dated: March 3, 2009)
Central Excise Ducts emerging at site during installation of heat ventilators and air conditioning systems do not pass the test of marketability and hence not excisable No infirmity in impugned order.: BANGALORE
CESTAT;
2009-TIOL-1254-CESTAT-MUM.pdf
CCE & CC, Aurangabad Vs Gaurav Agro Pipes (Dated: June 2, 2009)
Defective goods accompanied by letters issued by customers and Cenvat Credit taken thereon - such letters are not the documents specified under rule 9 for the availment of cenvat credit - procedure prescribed under rule has to be followed for claiming benefit there under and is a basic tenet of law recognized by the Supreme Court Commissioner(A)'s order set aside and Revenue appeal allowed.: MUMBAI
CESTAT;
CUSTOMS SECTION
2009-TIOL-1260-CESTAT-BANG.pdf
M/s Bhagwan Mahaveer Jain College Vs CC, Bangalore (Dated: March 16, 2009)
Customs Eligibility of Notification 51/96-Cus Registrar of University certified usage of imported computers and servers by the college meant for research purposes Prima facie strong case for waiver of pre-deposit Stay granted.: BANGALORE CESTAT; 2009-TIOL-1259-CESTAT-BANG.pdf
CC, Vizag Vs M/s Acalmar Oil & Fats Ltd (Dated: January 5, 2009)
Customs - Import Ex-bond bill of entry - Interest - If any clearance is made within the initial warehousing period, only duty has to be paid and not interest. The period of 05 days from the date of return of the assessed Bills of Entry under Section 47 applies to the Bills of Entry for home consumption only.: BANGALORE CESTAT; 2009-TIOL-1256-CESTAT-MAD.pdf
Precot Mills Ltd Vs CC, Tuticorin (Dated: May 22, 2009)
Customs EPCG licences appellant did not possess licences as on the date of import plea that same was due to delay in issuance of licences by DGFT is not acceptable benefit of exemption under Notification 160/92 Cus dated 20.4.92 is not available.: CHENNAI CESTAT;
|