promotion_jc.pdf
Promotion to the grade of Joint Commissioner - Posting of Officers on Promotion;
SERVICE TAX SECTION 2009-TIOL-1029-CESTAT-MUM.pdf + liquor story.pdf
M/s Y M Krishna SSK Ltd Vs CCE, Pune-II (Dated: June 19, 2009) Applicant, a country liquor manufacturer, enters into selling agency agreement with a HUF allowing them to use their brand name ‘Pahili Dhar' – whether Service Tax payable under ‘Intellectual Property Services' – CESTAT grants complete waiver of pre-deposit. :MUMBAI CESTAT; 2009-TIOL-1028-CESTAT-KOL.pdf
M/s Avian Overseas Pvt Ltd Vs CCE, CC & ST, BBSR II (Dated: March 6, 2009) ST - BAS and Cargo Handling Service - Assessee is registered and pays tax on site formation services and mining services - for prior period Revenue raises demand under BAS and Cargo handling service - held, BAS does not apply to manufacture of excisable goods and since coal is an excisable good it is not applicable - transportation within the mining area is also outside the service tax net but loading and unloading of goods and transportation outside the mining area are covered under cargo handling service - cum-tax value to be taken into consideration but no penalty as clarificatory circular came later - Assessee's appeal allowed :KOLKATA CESTAT; 2009-TIOL-1027-CESTAT-DEL.pdf
M/s Samsung Corning Co Ltd Vs CST, Jaipur (Dated: May 14, 2009)
ST - Consulting Engineer Service - Assessee pleads that it provided IPR service and received royalty for the same - held, no record produced by Revenue to controvert the assessee's claim - waiver from pre-deposit granted : DELHI CESTAT;
CENTRAL EXCISE SECTION
2009-TIOL-1026-CESTAT-MAD.pdf
CCE, Chennai Vs M/s Jain Rubber (P) Ltd (Dated: March 16, 2009)
Central Excise – Classification – Latex Bulbs - The list of items covered under entry 40.14 and explained in the note under the entry in HSN are all not capable of use as such independently; some of them such as bulbs for syringes form part of other appliances. The latex bulb in question used in an IV set is a hygienic article of vulcanized rubber other than hard rubber belonging to the family of articles cited in the explanation under entry 40.14 of HSN. Hence, the item is appropriately classifiable under CSH 4014.90. ( Para 4) :CHENNAI CESTAT; 2009-TIOL-1025-CESTAT-MUM.pdf
M/s Jai Prakash Strips Ltd Vs CCE & CC, Nashik (Dated: June 9, 2009)
If applicant is aggrieved with the order of pre-deposit of Tribunal, remedy lies elsewhere and not by way of modification of the order – Modification application dismissed.:MUMBAI CESTAT;
CUSTOMS SECTION
CIRCULAR
dgft08cir097.pdf
Import of waste paper; CASE LAWS
2009-TIOL-1024-CESTAT-BANG.pdf
M/s H T Company Vs CC & CCE, Hyderabad (Dated: February 19, 2009 )
Customs – Goods imported in violation of import policy liable for confiscation – Redemption fine and penalty reduced – Chartered Engineer's certificate for valuation of non-declared goods to be accepted and duty liability worked out accordingly – Insurance amount to be added only on actual basis - Matter remanded to re-quantify value :BANGALORE CESTAT; |