SERVICE TAX SECTION
2009-TIOL-905-CESTAT-BANG.pdf
M/s Pasha Educational Training Institute Vs CCE, Hyderabad (Dated: February 13, 2009) Service Tax – Training provided to candidates in various fields covered by Commercial Training or Coaching service, but exempt vide Notification 9/03-ST as vocational training – Issue covered vide Tribunal order in appellants own case 2009-TIOL-288-CESTAT-BANG :BANGALORE CESTAT;
2009-TIOL-902-CESTAT-DEL.pdf
M/s Korea Plant Service & Engg Co Ltd Vs CCE, Jaipur-II (Dated: April 17, 2009) ST - Maintenance & Repair Service - Aassessee pays tax on entire contract amount - takes cenvat credit - Revenue disallows credit on tax paid on activities other than maintenance - held, prima facie, assessee paid tax on the entire contractual amount and the denial of credit on the ground that part of input services was not used in maintenance service is not justified - waiver of pre-deposit granted :DELHI CESTAT;
CENTRAL EXCISE SECTION
2009-TIOL-906-CESTAT-BANG.pdf
Andhra Cements Limited Vs CCE, CC & ST, Guntur (Dated: February 19, 2009)
Central Excise – Default in payment of excise duty under Rule 8 of CER, 2002 - Amount debited in CENVAT A/c towards duty liability to be regarded as discharge of all duty liability by appellant in view of o verriding provisions of Section 22 of SIFRA, 1985 and Order of BIFR – Order demanding interest and penalty set aside :BANGALORE CESTAT;
2009-TIOL-904-CESTAT-MUM.pdf + john story.pdf
CCE, Pune-III Vs M/s John Deere Equipments Pvt Ltd (Dated: May 11, 2009) To any prudent man, ambiguity is writ large on the order of the Commissioner(Appeals) – Observing thus, CESTAT remands matter to appellate authority :MUMBAI CESTAT; 2009-TIOL-903-CESTAT-AHM.pdf
M/s Diamond Cables Ltd Vs CCE, Vadodara (Dated: April 24, 2009)
Central Excise – When goods are cleared to sister unit and returns filed with authorities intimating the same extended period not invocable – No malafide attributable to assessee when the entire exercise is revenue neutral – Penalties set aside:AHMEDABAD CESTAT;
CUSTOMS SECTION
instruction09_005.pdf
Export of Edible Oil in branded packs of upto 5 Kg.;
CASE LAWS
2009-TIOL-305-HC-P&H-EXIM.pdf + FTP story.pdf
Escorts Limited Vs UoI ( Dated : May 20, 2009)
FTP - Retrospective withdrawal of Target Plus Scheme, quashed – Govt loses case because it failed to get the case transferred to Supreme Court: The High Court is also in full agreement with the judgment passed by the High Court of Gujarat in the case of Welspun India Ltd. v. Union of India. Adopting the same reasoning, the Court allowed the present writ petition and quashed the notification No. 08(RE-2006)/2004-2009 dated 12.06.2006 issued by the Director General of Foreign Trade and Ex-Officio Additional Secretary to the Government of India, and declared it ultravires the Act, 1992 so far as it gives retrospective effect and the petitioners are held entitled to get duty credit entitlement certificate, if entitled to otherwise.:
PUNJAB AND HARYANA
HIGH COURT;
2009-TIOL-901-CESTAT-MUM.pdf
CC, Mumbai Vs M/s BE Office Automation Pvt Ltd (Dated: December 4, 2009)
Customs – Recovery of erroneous refund can be initiated by way of appeal against the quasi-judicial order without recourse to fresh SCN – Reliance placed on CA certificate to decide unjust enrichment without examining the supporting documents for issue of certificate not sustainable – Orders passed without examining various contentions raised in appeal memo and without discussing relevant case laws liable to be set aside – Matter remanded to original authority for de novo adjudication of refund claims by following principles of natural justice to both parties :MUMBAI CESTAT;
|