SERVICE TAX SECTION
2009-TIOL-766-CESTAT-AHM.pdf
CCE, Rajkot Vs M/s J M Baxi & Co (Dated: April 24, 2009) ST - Sec 35F - Assessee claims refund of deposits made after success in appeal - unjust enrichment - held, issue is no longer res integra as no unjust enrichment can be alleged as refund is to be made to the assessee after he succeeds in appeal :AHMEDABAD CESTAT;
CENTRAL EXCISE SECTION
2009-TIOL-768-CESTAT-MUM.pdf
CCE, Mumbai-V Vs National Leather Cloth Mfg Co (Dated: January 13, 2009)
Show cause notice issued on 27.12.2000 proposing recovery of wrongly availed modvat credit in terms of the provisions of law viz. rule 57I which had become non est cannot be held to be a valid notice – Tribunal decision in Dow Chemical International Pvt. Ltd. [2008-TIOL-834-CESTAT-Mum] followed.:MUMBAI CESTAT; 2009-TIOL-767-CESTAT-MAD.pdf
CCE, Tirunelveli Vs M/s Jaison Garments (Dated: February 4, 2009)
Central Excise – CENVAT – Credit on inputs, inputs in process, and inputs relatable to final products when final product exempted subsequently - There are no provisions in the statute to recover any amount of CENVAT credit availed or utilized in accordance with relevant provisions. Input credit legally taken and utilized on the dutiable final products, need not be reversed on the final products becoming exempt subsequently. In the result, demands for recovery of CENVAT credit relatable inputs and work-in-progress and final products in stock are not sustainable. ( Para 4):CHENNAI CESTAT;
CUSTOMS SECTION
NOTIFICATION ctariff09_050.pdf
Definitive anti-dumping duty on import of Cathode Ray Colour TV Tubes imposed; ctariff09_049.pdf
Definitive anti-dumping duty on import of steel and fibre glass tapes imposed; CASE LAWS
2009-TIOL-769-CESTAT-DEL-LB.pdf + LB story.pdf
DCM Shriram Consolidated Ltd Vs UoI (Dated: April 16, 2009)
Revenue's apathy in rendering assistance to Tribunal, unfortunate: it is necessary to express our displeasure for failure on the part of the respondent No. 1 to appeal before the Tribunal and to assist the Tribunal in the matter. It is most unfortunate that the Department which is concerned with the revenue matters has shown a total apathy for rendering the necessary assistance to this Tribunal. We hope and trust that henceforth proper steps would be taken to give adequate assistance in all those matters :MUMBAI CESTAT LARGER BENCH;
|