SERVICE TAX SECTION
2009-TIOL-698-CESTAT-AHM.pdf
Mr
Nirav Industries Vs Commissioner of Customs, Excise & ST,
Rajkot (Dated: March 27, 2009)
Service
tax - In view of contradictory decisions on liability to pay
service tax by consignment agent as C & F agent prior
to LB judgment in Medpro Pharma [2006-TIOL-848-CESTAT-DEL-LB] bonafide
belief of assessee cannot be faulted for suppression or mis-statement – Demand
invoking extended period set aside - Matter remanded for
re-quantification of tax and penalty under s. 78 set aside: AHMEDABAD
CESTAT;
2009-TIOL-697-CESTAT-BANG.pdf
M/s Stanzen Toyotetsu India Private Limited Vs CCE, Bangalore (Dated: December 31, 2009)
Service tax - Services for canteen, transportation and group health insurance for employees are input services - Cost incurred forming part of cost of production as per CAS-4 - Tax paid thereon available as credit - Impugned orders set aside:BANGALORE CESTAT;
CENTRAL EXCISE SECTION
2009-TIOL-215-HC-DEL-CX.pdf + Kandhari Radio Story.pdf
CCE Vs M/s Kandhari Radio (Dated: April 22, 2009)
Central Excise -Appeal - High Court cannot condone delay - Revenue Appeal dismissed: In view of the categorical and unequivocal observations with regard to the law on condonation of delay in filing appeals which permeates through the decision in Singh Enterprises, Punjab Fibres Ltd . as well as Hongo India (P) Ltd ., constrained to dismiss the Appeal as it has been filed beyond the prescribed period of 180 days.:DELHI HIGH COURT;
2009-TIOL-696-CESTAT-BANG.pdf
CCE,
Chandigarh Vs M/s Raja Forgings & Gears
Ltd (Dated: February 18, 2009)
Central
Excise - Classification of gears, shafts which are parts of Harvester
Combine held as classifiable under sub heading 8483.90 whereas
Revenue sought classification under 8433.00 in their appeal though
original authority classified them under 8483.90 - Application
for ROM by assessee on the ground that new Tariff itself classified
parts of Harvester Combine under 843300 and that Revenue cannot
take two contradictory stand – Held, remedy of appeal, review
are creature of statute and ROM being empowered under s. 35(2)
cannot be on a higher pedestal - Tribunal's power of review
cannot be used a tool by disgruntled assessees to prolong proceedings
- Power of ROM to be exercised with due care and circumscription: BANGALORE CESTAT;
2009-TIOL-696-CESTAT-BANG.pdf
Rollwell
Conveyor Components Pvt Ltd Vs CC & CCE, Gantur (Dated:
December 29, 2009) Central Excise - Non-accountal of raw materials/finished goods liable for confiscation and penal action - In view of prevailing circumstances, redemption fine and penalties reduced - Equivalent penalty set aside:BANGALORE CESTAT;
CUSTOMS SECTION
2009-TIOL-700-CESTAT-DEL.pdf +
R K International Delhi story.pdf
CC, New Delhi Vs M/s R K International (Dated:
February 27, 2009)
Customs – Recovery of duty without proposing
a demand in SCN issued under Ss. 124 & 125 not sustainable – Specific
demand of duty required to be made in addition to proposal for
confiscation, penalty & redemption fine in lieu of confiscation: DELHI CESTAT;
2009-TIOL-695-CESTAT-DEL.pdf
M/s Ashoosons Vs CC, New Delhi (Dated: November 21, 2009)
Customs - Assessment orders of bills of entry are appealable orders - Certified copies of orders not required for filing of appeals before Appellate Commissioner - Delays ranging from 11 months to more than 3 years not condonable by Commissioner (Appeals) - Appellate Commissioners findings to the extent of appellant's claim for certified copies of orders as a deliberate attempt to surmount limitation period set aside in view of specific directions of High Court :DELHI CESTAT; |