SEZ
INSTRUCTION
sez06ins009.pdf
80IA Procedure for Reimbursement of Duty (RoD) in lieu of drawback
for supply of goods to SEZ Developers against Indian Rupees;
SERVICE TAX SECTION
2009-TIOL-468-CESTAT-MAD.pdf
CCE, Chennai Vs M/s Showa Engineering Ltd (Dated: January 28, 2009)
Service
Tax – CENVAT – Input services – Mobile Phones - With effect from
10.9.2004 credit of service tax paid in respect of mobile telephones
is admissible, provided the mobile phones are used for providing
output service or in or in relation to manufacture of finished
goods. (Para 5): CHENNAI CESTAT;
2009-TIOL-464-CESTAT-AHM.pdf
M/s Kiran Motors Ltd Vs CCEx, Vadodara-II (Dated: January 13, 2009)
ST - Automobile Service Station - Assessee provides three free service during warranty period of new car sales - Revenue alleges dealer's margin is included in the commission paid to the assessee - prima facie, the assessee makes a good case - waiver from pre-deposit granted: AHMEDABAD CESTAT;
2009-TIOL-463-CESTAT-DEL.pdf
M/s Bhatia Money Changer Vs CCE, Jalandhar (Dated: February 6, 2009)
ST - Money changing service - Assessee transfers money on behalf of the employer - argues no service is involved in this exercise - since it is a new service, pre-deposit waiver is granted: DELHI CESTAT;
CENTRAL EXCISE SECTION
2009-TIOL-467-CESTAT-DEL.pdf
CCE, Kanpur Vs M/s Synthetic Silica Products (Dated: November 6, 2008)
Central Excise - quantum of penalty under Section 11 AC is equal to the duty as held by the Apex Court in Dharmendra Textile Processors case - Revenue appeal allowed: DELHI CESTAT;
2009-TIOL-466-CESTAT-MAD.pdf + L G Balakrishnan Story.pdf
L
G Balakrishnan & Bros Limited Vs CCE, Coimbatore (Dated:
October 3, 2008)
Central
Excise – CENVAT Credit – stay/dispensation of pre-deposit – input
services relating to the wind mills located at places away from
the factory - there is no dispute that the appellants generated
power in their windmills and used the same in their manufacturing
facility - prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit: CHENNAI CESTAT;
CUSTOMS SECTION
CASE LAW
2009-TIOL-470-CESTAT-MUM.pdf + rom story.pdf
CC,
Mumbai Vs M/s Mahavir Health & Relief Society (Dated: January
27, 2009)
An appeal
cannot be clothed as a ROM application – Tribunal dismisses Revenue's
ROM application.: MUMBAI CESTAT; 2009-TIOL-469-CESTAT-KOL.pdf
Md Abdullah Vs CC, Kolkata (Dated: December 23, 2008)
Customs – Seizure of bullocks and cows including transport vehicle by BSF – No evidence adduced by Revenue that the cattle were exported or attempted to be exported to foreign country – Findings of original authority and appellate authority on the origin of goods contradictory and do not inspire confidence – Impugned order set aside – Sale
proceeds from auction of seized cattle to be paid back to appellants: KOLKATA CESTAT;
2009-TIOL-465-CESTAT-AHM.pdf
M/s Hamilton House Wares Pvt Ltd Vs CC, Ahmedabad (Dated: January 30, 2009)
Customs – Mis-declaration and undervaluation of import of opal ware – Borosilicate glassware containing boric oxide ranging from 9.68% to 12.27% showing no thermal expansion (0 to 300°C), no breakage on heating and indicating low linear coefficient of expansion is opal ware according to ASTMC 162 – Revenue adduced enough evidence to suggest mis-declaration and undervaluation – Prima facie case in favour of Revenue – Bank
guarantees for Rs. 62 lakhs allowed to be encashed by Revenue and
pre-deposit of balance amount of duty and penalty waived: AHMEDABD CESTAT; |