| rlt_88_part7.pdf + rlt_88_part8.pdf + rlt_88_part9.pdf
RLT Case Laws Headnotes;
CENTRAL EXCISE SECTION
2008-TIOL-1782-CESTAT-MUM.pdf
M/s Vijay Chemicals Industries Vs CCE, Belapur (Dated: July 11, 2008)
CENVAT Credit – Conversion of DTA into 100% EOU – Transfer of balance CENVAT Credit lying in books – Rule 10 of CCR applicable to 100% EOUs and no bar to carry forward the available credit balance – Order of Commr (A) beyond the scope of SCN and liable to be set aside: MUMBAI CESTAT;
2008-TIOL-1780-CESTAT-AHM.pdf
CCE, Vadodara-I Vs M/s Vijay Tanks & Vessels (Dated: August 6, 2008)
Central Excise – demand of CENVAT Credit on capital goods on the ground that the credit was availed before receipt into the factory – the assessee is liable to pay interest till the date of receipt in the factory – no case for imposing penalty as the machine has not been given to someone else – matter remanded for computation of interest. : AHMEDABAD CESTAT;
SERVICE TAX SECTION
2008-TIOL-1783-CESTAT-MUM.pdf + stax story.pdf
CST, Mumbai Vs B G Talwarkar Physique Club (Dated: September 19, 2008)
Plea of ignorance cannot be taken when the fact remains that the respondents collected service tax from their customers and pocketed the same – Penalties imposable - Tribunal allows revenue appeal: MUMBAI CESTAT;
2008-TIOL-1778-CESTAT-DEL.pdf
M/s Career Infosystems Ltd Vs CCE, Jaipur (Dated: September 11, 2008) ST - Franchise service - Demand raised for commercial coaching and training service - Commissioner(A) and Tribunal set aside the demand - Issue pending with High Court - Fresh SCN issued for the same service and the same priod - No valid ground for the same; pre-deposit waived and stay granted : DELHI CESTAT;
CUSTOMS SECTION
2008-TIOL-1781-CESTAT-MUM.pdf
M/s Videocon Industries Ltd Vs CC (I), Nhava Sheva (Dated: January 18, 2008)
Customs – Duty paid on quantity in excess of actual imports – Documents available to prove that duty paid on imports is erroneous and on the higher side – Error apparent on record to be mitigated by s. 154 – Impugned order denying the refund claim liable to be set aside: MUMBAI CESTAT;
2008-TIOL-1779-CESTAT-MAD.pdf
M Renganathan Vs CC, Chennai (Dated: August 12, 2008)
Customs – penalty – penalty under Section 117 of the Customs Act is not leviable on Custom House Agent for mis-declaration in Bill of Entry. : CHENNAI
CESTAT; |