| CENTRAL EXCISE SECTION
2008-TIOL-1699-CESTAT-MUM.pdf + coconut story.pdf
CCE Vs M/s Sweet Confectionary (Dated: August 28, 2008)
Duty paid “Coconut Punch Chocolates” bought in bulk and repacked with manufactured “Coffee Bite chocolates” and cleared on payment of duty under s.4A is entitled for Cenvat Credit – Tribunal.
Activity of packing of duty paid “Coconut Punch chocolate” along with manufactured “Coffee bite” is an activity amounting to manufacture, and as there is an activity of manufacturing, the duty paid Coconut Punch chocolate produced by respondents has to be considered as an input for manufacturing final products ‘Coffee bite' – Cenvat credit allowed.
Tribunal decision in the case of Lotte India Corporation [2008-TIOL-359-CESTAT-MAD] relied upon.:MUMBAI CESTAT; 2008-TIOL-1698-CESTAT-MUM.pdf
M/s Rallis India Ltd Vs CCE, Coimbatore (Dated: August 8, 2008)
Central Excise – exemption under Notification 181/86 CE dated 1.3.86 for fertilizers – the appellants had knowingly availed the exemption for goods cleared to poultry units to be used as feed for chickens – invoking extended period is upheld. :MUMBAI CESTAT; 2008-TIOL-1697-CESTAT-MUM.pdf
M/s Glaxo Smithkline Pharma Ltd Vs CCE, Nashik (Dated: July 27, 2008)
Central Excise - Cenvat credit - Assessee avails credit on common inputs used in manufacture of exempted and dutiable products - Credit of service tax paid on common input services also availed on pro-rata basis to the extent credit was attributable to dutiable goods - adjudicating authority confirms sum equal to 10% of total price of exempted products - Since this issue is already pending with the Larger Bench, stay granted along with waiver of pre-deposit :MUMBAI CESTAT; 2008-TIOL-1696-CESTAT-DEL.pdf
CCE, Jaipur-II Vs M/s Grasim Industries (Dated: August 26, 2008)
CENVAT/MODVAT Credit – Clearance of scrap of machinery during 1995 to 1999 – No evidence to suggest that the appellants have availed MODVAT Credit on these goods received by them during prior period – No reason to interfere with the findings of the Commissioner (Appeals) :DELHI CESTAT;
SERVICE TAX SECTION
2008-TIOL-1694-CESTAT-DEL.pdf
M/s Chetan Traders Vs CCE, Jaipur (Dated: July 17, 2008)
ST - Business Auxiliary Service - Assessee sells telecom products of BSNL and earns commission - Revenue demands tax - Assessee argues since it buys goods from BSNL and sells them to earn profit and pays sales tax on the same, service tax provisions are not applicable - The case is squarely covered by the Tribunal's decision in the case of Karakkattu Communications ( 2007-TIOL-1374-CESTAT-BANG ) in favour of assessee :DELHI CESTAT; 2008-TIOL-1693-CESTAT-MAD.pdf
M/s Pudukottai District Central Co-Op Bank Ltd Vs CCE, Trichy (Dated: July 10, 2008)
Service tax – Banking and other financial services – gold jewllery appraising charges collected from the borrowers has nothing to do with “other financial services” – demand of service tax set aside.: CHENNAI CESTAT; 2008-TIOL-1692-CESTAT-MAD.pdf
M/s Southern Iron & Steel Co Ltd Vs CCE, Salem (Dated: July 31, 2008)
Service tax – Goods transport Agency Service – demand of service tax – matter remanded to the adjudicating authority for verification of records and pass appropriate orders. : CHENNAI CESTAT;
CUSTOMS SECTION
NOTIFICATION
cnt08_113.pdf
CBEC revises tariff value of brass scraps and poppy seeds; ctariff08_108.pdf
Anti-dumping duty on Chloroquine phosphate extended till September, 2009; CASE LAWS 2008-TIOL-1695-CESTAT-MUM.pdf
National Steel And Agro Industries Ltd Vs CC, Mumbai (Dated: July 23, 2008)
Customs – Allegation of diversion of duty free imported goods for sale – No concrete evidence to substantiate the allegation – Statement of company official who was not an employee at the time of such clearances cannot be held to be conclusive in the absence of corroborative evidence – ER 1s relied upon by the Commissioner to prove his case pertain to the period not covered in the SCN – Evidence to show that for the period under reference appellants imported materials on payment of duty – Primafacie strong case in favour of appellants – Pre-deposit waived and order stayed : MUMBAI CESTAT; |