CENTRAL EXCISE SECTION
2008-TIOL-1414-CESTAT-MUM.pdf + brand name story.pdf
M/s Nageshwar Enterprises Vs CCE, Nasik (Dated:July 10, 2008)
Applicant has only affixed brand name on goods which were purchased from market and got job work done on them – Prima facie, activity does not amount to manufacture – Tribunal waives pre-deposit of duty and penalty and grants Stay.:MUMBAI CESTAT; 2008-TIOL-1411-CESTAT-MAD.pdf
CCE, Pondicherry Vs M/s Cheyyar Co-Operative Sugar Mills Ltd (Dated: June 23, 2008) Central Excise – CENVAT Credit – provisions of Rule 6(3) (b) of the CENVAT Credit Rules cannot be invoked for bio fertilizer made from press-mud arising during the manufacture of molasses. :CHENNAI
CESTAT;
SERVICE TAX SECTION
2008-TIOL-1413-CESTAT-AHM.pdf
M/s Shree Sardar Patel Seva Samaj Vs CST, Ahmedabad (Dated:July 25, 2008) ST - Penalty - Assessee pays tax with interest even before being pointed out by the Revenue - pleads waiver of penalty - It is a fit case for invocation of Sec 80 - Penalty set aside : AHMEDABAD CESTAT;
CUSTOMS SECTION
2008-TIOL-1412-CESTAT-MAD.pdf
M/s Roy Electronics Vs CC, Chennai (Dated:May 2, 2008) Customs – confiscation - the electronic balances imported by the appellants were not of metric system and the same were prohibited under Section 49 of the Customs Act - The party was given an opportunity to get the balances converted into metric system. In the absence of Legal Metrology Department's certificate, it cannot be said that such conversion was achieved - confiscation order under Section 111(d) of the Customs Act is sustainable. : CHENNAI CESTAT;
|