CENTRAL EXCISE SECTION
2008-TIOL-362-HC-MAD-CX.pdf + penalty story.pdf
CC And CCE, Coimbatore Vs M/s Kannapiran Steel Re-Rolling Mills ( Dated: June 12, 2008 )
Central Excise - Penalty equal to duty - can be reduced by authorities : MADRAS HIGH COURT;
2008-TIOL-1182-CESTAT-BANG.pdf
CCE, Hyderabad Vs M/s Everest Organics Limited (Dated: January 31, 2008)
Central Excise – excisability – spent solvents are not manufactured goods and not dutiable – no infirmity in the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) – revenue appeal has no merit. : BANGALORE CESTAT;
SERVICE TAX SECTION
2008-TIOL-1183-CESTAT-MAD.pdf
CCE, Trichy Vs Rasi Travel & Cargo Pvt Ltd (Dated: April 4, 2008)
Delay in Registration & Payment of Service Tax – CA reduces penalty in terms of Section 80 on grounds of reasonable cause – Revenue has no grounds to contradict his findings – Revenue appeal dismissed : CHENNAI CESTAT;
CUSTOMS SECTION
2008-TIOL-1184-CESTAT-BANG.pdf
M/s Sarayu Softtech Pvt Ltd Vs CC, Bangalore (Dated: February 14, 2008)
CESTAT expresses displeasure over non-assistance of the revenue to the Bench despite several requests by the Bench – marks a copy to the Chairman and Revenue Secretary to look into the matter. :MUMBAI CESTAT; |