CENTRAL EXCISE SECTION
2008-TIOL-1055-CESTAT-MAD.pdf + cenvat story.pdf
M/s Kyungshin Industrial Motherson Ltd Vs CCE, Chennai (Dated : April 17, 2008)
Cenvat Credit taken wrongly, but not utilized – No interest & penalty – It is obvious that Section 11 AB Provides for recovery of interest, on amounts of due duty not paid in time, for the delay in payment. Interest is recovered as compensation to the State for depriving it use of the money for the duration of delay. In the instant case there has been no utilization of credit. The same remained in the account and was reversed before the issue of show Cause Notice. In the circumstances I find that the demand of interest and imposition of penalty on the appellants is not sustainable. :CHENNAI CESTAT; 2008-TIOL-1054-CESTAT-DEL.pdf
M/s Hindustan Zinc Limited Vs CCE, Jaipur-II (Dated : January 8, 2008)
Electrical items like sockets, switches, plugs, junction boxes, etc. are used for running the plant, Jointing sheet and Leak repair clamp are used in plant to prevent leakage – Modvat/cenvat Credit available.
Tyres and Tubes are capital goods – credit available.
Steel Wire ropes – credit available in view of Tribunal decision in KCP Ltd. vs. CCE, Guntur 2005-TIOL-1413-CESTAT-BANG .
Credit taken on original copy of invoice – credit rightly denied.
Pneumatic cylinders – no declaration filed under rule 57G/57T – credit not available. : DELHI CESTAT; 2008-TIOL-1051-CESTAT-BANG.pdf
M/s Balaji Galvanising Industries Ltd Vs CC & CE, Hyderabad (Dated : February 28, 2008) Wire – drawing – not manufacture – credit eligible : BANGALORE CESTAT; 2008-TIOL-1050-CESTAT-DEL.pdf
M/s Sangam Structurals Ltd Vs CCE, Allahabad (Dated : January 9, 2008)
Central Excise – allegation of removal of goods on the same invoice again and again and the firm to which the clearances were made as non existing – no evidence adduced to support the allegations - no investigation was conducted regarding sales tax paid by the trading firm – impugned orders not sustainable. : DELHI CESTAT;
SERVICE TAX SECTION
2008-TIOL-1053-CESTAT-DEL.pdf
M/s Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd Vs CCE, Meerut (Dated : May 7, 2008)
ST - IUC service - Revenue demands tax - In view of Board's Circular the assessee is not liable to pay tax for period prior to the dates when the amended definition of 'telecommunication service' came into effect vide Finance Bill, 2007 : DELHI CESTAT; 2008-TIOL-1049-CESTAT-MUM.pdf
CCE & CC, Goa Vs Essel Propacks Limited (Dated : April 25, 2008)
ST - Cenvat Credit - Issue is decided in favour of the assessee as credit on service tax paid on GTA service cannot be denied :MUMBAI CESTAT;
CUSTOMS SECTION
NOTIFICATION
dgft08pn044.pdf
DGFT makes amendments related to DFIA scheme in the Hand Book of Procedures, Vol. I (RE-2008);
dgft08pn043.pdf
DGFT excludes agency commission for calculating FoB value of export; dgft08pn042.pdf
DGFT amends 'General Note for Fuel' import;
CASE LAWS
2008-TIOL-1052-CESTAT-MAD.pdf
M L Kunjumon Vs CC, Cochin (Dated : April 29, 2008)
Customs – smuggling of silver – penalty imposed for abetment of smuggling of contraband is in accordance with law – However, considering facts of the case, penalty on the appellant is reduced to Rs 1 lakh. :CHENNAI CESTAT; |