Taxindiaonline.com - Daily Mail Update
 
2008-TIOL-NEWS-154
Saturday, June 28, 2008
 
News Flash

Sonia asks party leaders to swing into poll mode;

Govt takes steps to help overseas Indian workers;

Deora says no tax holiday for NELP-VII;

     
 

Dear Member,

Sending the following files:

 
     
Common Basket

2008-TIOL-04-CIC.pdf + cic story.pdf

CPIO's casual attitude of deputing a Superintendent for hearing irks CIC – warns him of serious consequences if he repeats it;

rbi07cir053.pdf

Overseas Direct Investment by Registered Trust / Society ;

mbuzz752.pdf

Govt seeks inputs for setting up National Biotechnology Regulatory Authority;

mbuzz751.pdf

Deora says no tax holiday for NELP-VII;

mbuzz750.pdf

Govt takes steps to help overseas Indian workers ;

 
Direct Tax Basket

2008-TIOL-325-HC-P-H-IT.pdf

CIT, Ludiana Vs M/s Vanaik Spinning Mills Ltd (Dated: April 10, 2008 )

Income Tax - Unutilised modvat credit - Assessee adjusts the same in opening stock - Revenue disallows - Tribunal allows it - Issue is no longer res integra as it is settled in favour of the assessee : P & H HIGH COURT ;

 
Indirect Tax Basket

CENTRAL EXCISE SECTION

2008-TIOL-1010-CESTAT-MAD.pdf + depb story.pdf

M/s Loyal Textile Mills Ltd Vs CCE, Chennai (Dated : May 9, 2008)

Credit of CVD paid in DEPB - at the material time, there was a divergence of opinion as to the admissibility of Modvat credit of CVD Paid by adjustment in DEPB Scrip among the various benches of the Tribunal. The issue was ultimately resolved by the decision of the Larger Bench in Essar Steel Ltd. Vs. CCE - 2004-TIOL-807-CESTAT-DEL-LB .

Penalty need not be imposed just for the reason that the statute provides for the same.  – The discretion to impose a penalty must be exercised judicially. A penalty will ordinarily be imposed in cases where the party acts deliberately in defiance of law, or is guilty of contumacious or dishonest conduct, or acts in conscious disregard of its obligations: but not, in cases where there is a technical or venial breach of the provisions of the Act or where the breach flows from a bona fide belief that the offender is not liable to act in the manner prescribed by the statute. :CHENNAI CESTAT;

2008-TIOL-1009-CESTAT-DEL.pdf

M/s Margra Industries Ltd Vs CCE, Noida (Dated : January 25, 2008)

Central Excise – condonation of delay in filing appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) beyond the period of ninety days – Section 35 of the Central Excise Act contains expression provisions for condonation of delay - Commissioner (Appeals) committed no error in dismissing the appeal on the ground of limitation - Question is whether Tribunal can direct the Commissioner to hear the appeal on merit. The Supreme Court rejected a similar contention observing that such a direction would render a specific provision providing for limitation rather otiose. :DELHI CESTAT;

2008-TIOL-1008-CESTAT-BANG.pdf

CCE, Hyderabad Vs M/s Sri Vajra Granites Limited (Dated : January 31, 2008)

100% EOUs – DTA sales – benefit of notification 8/97 CE can not be denied on the ground that Epoxy resin and Ager were used in polishing the granite slabs as the same are only consumables and not raw materials – no merit in revenue's appeals. : BANGALORE CESTAT;

 

SERVICE TAX SECTION

2008-TIOL-1011-CESTAT-MAD.pdf

M/s Nypro Forbes Products Ltd Vs CST, Chennai (Dated : February 7, 2008)

Intellectual Property Service is not Consulting Engineer's Service :CHENNAI CESTAT;

 

CUSTOMS SECTION

NOTIFICATION

dgft08not017.pdf

Import of marble : Licensing note amended;

dgft08pn034.pdf

DGFT adds more ports as 'port of registration';

dgft08cir012.pdf

Guidelines for import of Rough Marble Blocks/Slabs for the year 2008-09;

CASE LAWS

2008-TIOL-1007-CESTAT-MAD.pdf

Manish Kumar Jain Vs CC, Chennai (Dated : March 28, 2008)

Customs – duty demand on goods imported under Advance Licence on allegation of diversion from the job-workers – In case of post-export imports, the importer is not required to endorse the name of his job worker in the Licence – this aspect was not properly considered by the Commissioner – the Commissioner relied more on the oral evidences than the documentary evidences produced by the appellants - It is trite law that documentary evidence must prevail over oral evidence – matter remanded. :CHENNAI CESTAT;

 

Regards
Customercare Executive

Taxindiaonline.com Pvt. Ltd.
B-XI, 8183, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi-70
Tel. +91-11-26139742, 43
Fax. +91-11-26121990
Mobile. 9811005862
Web:
http: //www.taxindiaonline.com
Email: updates@taxindiaonline.com

____________________________
CONFIDENTIALITY/PROPRIETARY NOTE.
The Document accompanying this electronic transmission contains information from Taxindiaonline.com Pvt. Ltd.,which is confidential, proprietary or copyrighted and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named on this transmission. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. This prohibition includes, without limitation, displaying this transmission or any portion thereof, on any public bulletin board. If you are not the intended recipient of this document, please return this document to Taxindiaonline.com Pvt. Ltd. immediately.