CENTRAL EXCISE SECTION
CIRCULAR
excircular869.pdf
Procedure relating to sanction and post-audit of refund/rebate claims-reg.; CASE LAWS
2008-TIOL-272-HC-MUM-CX.pdf
Raymond Ltd Vs Union of India (Dated : May 6, 2008) Assessee apprehensive of arrest by Central Excise - Armed Guards waiting at his residence to take him into custody - arrest stayed - Rs 16 Crores pre-deposit ordered : BOMBAY HIGH COURT; 2008-TIOL-271-HC-MUM-CX.pdf
Raymond Ltd Vs Union of India (Dated : April 9, 2008)
Assessee states that Armed Guards are waiting at his residence to take him into custody – arrest stayed : BOMBAY HIGH COURT; 2008-TIOL-759-CESTAT-DEL.pdf + rom story.pdf
M/s Saluja Engg Works Vs CCE, Jamshedpur (Dated : April 3, 2008)
Tribunal's power of rectifying any mistake cannot be used as a tool by a disgruntled unsuccessful party to prolong the proceeding - ROM application rejected by Tribunal :DELHI CESTAT; 2008-TIOL-758-CESTAT-MUM.pdf
Deco Tubes Vs CC & CE, Thane-II (Dated : January 28, 2008)
Till the SC decision in Rukmani Pakkwell, various decisions of Tribunal held that the brand name, if it is similar to the brand name of some other person but used on different products, the eligibility of SSI Notification was never in doubt – appellant under bonafide belief that they are true owners of brand name “Gprecision” & entitled to the SSI exemption – extended period not invokable – Appeal allowed with consequential relief. : MUMBAI CESTAT; 2008-TIOL-756-CESTAT-MUM.pdf
M/s Kaprecon Sleeper Works Pvt Ltd Vs CCE, Nagpur (Dated : March 14, 2008)
As the appellants have paid the duty even before finalization of the provisional assessment, demand of interest is not sustainable in law – Issue no longer res integra in view of Tribunal decision in Hindustan Insecticides Ltd : MUMBAI
CESTAT;
SERVICE TAX SECTION
2008-TIOL-754-CESTAT-DEL.pdf
M/s Punjab Venture Capital Ltd Vs CCE, Chandigarh (Dated: February 27, 2008) ST - Management Consultancy - Assessee is a venture capital company - Revenue alleges the assessee provides inputs to management for proper running of business in systematic manner - Prima facie, the assessee has a strong case - Stay granted : DELHI CESTAT; 2008-TIOL-753-CESTAT-DEL.pdf
M/s Unibild Engineering & Construction Co Pvt Ltd Vs CST, New Delhi (Dated: April 3, 2008) ST - Commercial & Industrial Construction Service - Assessee gets cement and steel from service recipient and provides the service - Commissioner includes the value of goods provided by the service recipient and then extends benefits of Notification 18/2005 before confirming demand and imposing penalty - Since the tax was deposited before issuance of SCN, it is a fit case for waiver of interest and penalty for finaly disposal of the case : DELHI CESTAT;
CUSTOMS SECTION
NOTIFICATION
cnt08_044.pdf
Tariff Value of Brass scrap increased; ctariff08_069.pdf
Provisional anti dumping duty imposed on Polyester yarn from Indonesia, Korea, Malaysia and Taipei ; ctariff08_068.pdf
Anti Dumping duty on Polyester yarn - Notification No. 15/2007 amended; dgft08not011.pdf + dgft08not010.pdf + dgft08not009.pdf
Export of certain quantity of pulses, edible oil & non-basmati rice to Bhutan exempted from ban dgft08pn016.pdf
DGFT amends Electronic Fund Transfer fee for DEPB; dgft08pn015.pdf
M/s. Moody ICL Certifications Ltd., an agency notified at Sl. No.A.17 of Appendix 6, Handbook of Procedures Vol.I, is no longer under suspension; CASE LAWS 2008-TIOL-757-CESTAT-MUM.pdf
Shri Rajesh Sacheti Vs CC, Mumbai (Dated : March 10, 2008) Since the diamonds that were confiscated absolutely in the year 1997 were valued approx Rs.55 lakhs but are now valued at approximately Rs.2 crores, out of turn hearing justified. : MUMBAICESTAT; 2008-TIOL-755-CESTAT-BANG.pdf
Shri Abdul Rehman Vs CC, Hyderabad (Dated : January 30, 2008)
Charge of smuggling of gold not proved against the appellants – return of the seized foreign currency and the gold by Trial Court – Waiver of predeposit of penalty and stay of recovery of penalty : BANGALORE CESTAT; |