CENTRAL EXCISE SECTION
NOTIFICATION
etariff08_24.pdf
CBEC grants more procedural relief to EoUs / STPs; half-processed goods can be taken out of India and clear for exports without bringing the same back; CASE LAWS 2008-TIOL-575-CESTAT-MAD.pdf + lb story.pdf
M/s Lucas TVS Ltd Vs CCE, Chennai (Dated : February 25, 2008)
Central Excise – Duty - Supplementary invoice due to revision in prices – Interest payable? – Matter referred to Larger Bench –
++ Whether, in the facts of these cases, the additional amount paid by the buyer towards price of the goods in terms of the supplementary invoice issued by the assessee after removal of the goods can be considered to be part of the ‘transaction value' under Section 4 of the Central Excise Act;
++ Whether the payment of duty under the supplementary invoice by the assessee is covered by sub-section (2B) of Section 11A of the Act;
++ Whether, on the amount of duty paid under the supplementary invoice, interest is leviable under Section 11AB from the first date of the month succeeding the month in which duty was paid in the first instance in terms of the original invoice. : MUMBAI CESTAT; 2008-TIOL-574-CESTAT-AHM.pdf
CCE, Ahmedabad Vs M/s Shayona Enterprises (Dated : February 19, 2008)
Deposits made during the investigations are in the nature of provisional deposits and if the said deposit is not appropriated towards any final demand of duty or penalty, the same cannot be called to be deposit of duty, in which case the limitation provisions will not come into action – no infirmity in order of Commissioner(A) – Revenue appeal rejected. : AHMEDABAD CESTAT;
2008-TIOL-573-CESTAT-MUM.pdf
CCE, Mumbai IV Vs Tata Honey Well Ltd (Dated : March 25, 2008)
Software manufactured for specific & exclusive use in functioning of PLC & DCS are application software – exemption under notification 48/94CE available when cleared independently.
Terms software and computer software are nowhere defined separately either in any technical dictionary or any other authoritative text book - software manufactured by the respondents is specifically and exclusively used for functioning the various systems i.e. Programmable Logic Controllers (PLC) and Distributed Control System (DCS) and was not at all used for functioning of the computers and has therefore to be treated as an application software only - exemption under notification 48/94 dated 1.3.94 available – Revenue appeal rejected. : MUMBAI CESTAT; 2008-TIOL-572-CESTAT-MUM.pdf
M/s Nestle India Ltd Vs CCE, Goa (Dated : February 26, 2008)
Appellant claiming exemption under 6/2002CE on the ground that “Milky Bar Choo” is other than White chocolate - Test of common parlance and understanding whether applies – Prima facie whether decision in Little Star Foods 2006-TIOL-985-CESTAT-BANG applies is arguable – Pre-deposit ordered. : MUMBAI CESTAT;
SERVICE TAX SECTION
2008-TIOL-570-CESTAT-DEL.pdf
M/s India Glycols Ltd Vs CCE, Meerut II (Dated : February 20, 2008)
Credit availed on the basis of TR-6 challan before the same was notified as cenvatable document by notification 28/2005CE(N.T) - TR-6 Challans submitted by the appellant should have been taken to be adequate proof/evidence of payment of Service Tax entitling the appellant to claim cenvat credit – Since Commissioner has not dealt with this issue, matter remanded. :DELHI CESTAT; 2008-TIOL-569-CESTAT-MUM.pdf
M/s MRF Ltd Vs CCE, Goa (Dated : February 28, 2008) Notification 28/2005-CE(NT) w.e.f 16.06.2005 - GTA Service Tax credit for the period 01.01.2005 to 15.06.2005 on basis of TR-6 challans – Issue settled in favour of assessee by Tribunal decisions in Essel Pro-Pack Ltd., 2007-TIOL-1643-CESTAT-MUM & Puja Ferro Alloys Ltd. 2008-TIOL-220-CESTAT-MUM . :MUMBAI CESTAT; CUSTOMS SECTION
NOTIFICATION
ctariff08_049.pdf + ctariff08_048.pdf
Govt imposes anti-dumping duty on Sulphur Black + extends it on Sodium Nitrite; ctariff08_047.pdf
CBEC grants more procedural relief to EoUs / STPs; half-processed goods can be taken out of India and clear for exports without bringing the same back;
CASE LAWS 2008-TIOL-217-HC-DEL-CUS.pdf
Anirush Singh Katoch Vs UoI (Dated : March 20, 2008)
Import of fire-arm by NRI returning on Transfer of Residence – only one fire-arm allowed : DELHI HIGH COURT;
2008-TIOL-571-CESTAT-MUM.pdf + ghost story.pdf
CC (Import), Nhava Sheva Vs M/s Philoden Agrochem Pvt Ltd (Dated : January 11, 2008) Duty paid on 'ghost' goods received in a container – Refund not hit by vires of Section 28D of Customs Act – well reasoned order of Commissioner(A) upheld by Tribunal :MUMBAI CESTAT; |