CENTRAL EXCISE SECTION
2008-TIOL-214-HC-P&H-CX.pdf + delay stoy.pdf
State Of Haryana Vs CC, CE & ST Appellate Tribunal And Others (Dated : January 15, 2008 ) Central Excise – condonation of delay under Section 35 (B)– the appellant-State has given sufficient reasons for condoning the delay and the Tribunal was not justified in dismissing both the application for condonation of delay and the appeal filed by the appellant at the threshold. .: P & H HIGH COURT;
2008-TIOL-562-CESTAT-MUM.pdf
Harish Lamba Vs CCE, Mumbai (Dated : January 16, 2008)
Rule 173Q(2) providing for confiscation of land, plant, building, machinery, etc., was deleted from the statute w.e.f. 12/05/2000 and, therefore, show cause notice proposing such confiscation is bad in law as it was issued in 2001 and the upholding of the liability to confiscation is also not permissible in law – ROM application allowed as mistake is obvious. : MUMBAI CESTAT; 2008-TIOL-561-CESTAT-MAD.pdf
Universal Packaging Vs CCE, Mumbai V(Dated : January 17, 2008) SSI exemption – computation of aggregate value - Printed cartons cleared by assessee to buyer for packing goods for export - Applicants have filed sales tax forms which indicate that the purchaser had consumed these goods for the purpose of export – Prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit as issue involved identical to Tribunal decision in Vadapalani Press 2007-TIOL-798-CESTAT-MAD
Non-compliance of the filing of the declarations as per Board circular 212/46/96-Cx dated 20.5.1996 is only a procedural lapse – Substantial benefit cannot be denied if otherwise available. : CHENNAI CESTAT;
SERVICE TAX SECTION
2008-TIOL-560-CESTAT-MUM.pdf
M/s J K Travels Vs CC & CE, Nagpur (Dated : March 3, 2008)
ST - Tour Operatior - Demand raised for period Oct 2000 to Sept 2004 and Oct 2004 to March 2005 - The issue for the period prior to Oct 2004 when the definition of tour operator service underwent an amendment may be covered in favour of the assessee in view of the coordinate bench decision ( 2007-TIOL-430-CESTAT-AHM ) but for the later period to be examined - Pre-deposit ordered . : MUMBAI CESTAT;
CUSTOMS SECTION
NOTIFICATION
dgft08cir001.pdf
Service tax refund on exports : A clarification; dgft08not002.pdf
DGFT notifies ports for import and exports of
wood logs;
dgft08not003.pdf
Prohibition on export of edible oils - some exceptions; dgft08not004.pdf
export of cement banned;
CASE LAWS
2008-TIOL-559-CESTAT-MAD.pdf
M/s. Kavia Carbons (Chennai) P Ltd Vs CC, Tuticorin (Dated : January 16, 2008)
Customs – export of contraband- penalty: When there is no finding that the appellant company did anything to export or abet the export of contraband, the charge against the appellant company is not sustainable.-stay granted. : CHENNAI CESTAT; |