CENTRAL EXCISE SECTION
2008-TIOL-558-CESTAT-BANG.pdf
M/s NCS Distilleries Pvt Ltd Vs CCE, II Vizag (Dated : January 18, 2008)
Education cess is not liable to be paid on products, which are not liable to Central Excise duty :
BANGALORE CESTAT; 2008-TIOL-557-CESTAT-MAD.pdf
M/s Dattatreya Textiles (P) Ltd Vs CCE, Madurai (Dated : December 12, 2007)
Insulation material used in humidification plant – capital goods credit allowed :CHENNAI CESTAT; 2008-TIOL-556-CESTAT-DEL.pdf
M/s HMT Ltd Vs CCE, Panchkula (Dated : January 30, 2008) Tractors exempted vide notification 23/2004CE dt. 9.7.2004 - Whether the Cenvat Credit involved on the inputs lying in stock as such or contained in the work in process or used in the manufacture of tractors lying in stock is required to be reversed – In view of conflicting orders passed by the coordinate benches of the Tribunal, matter referred to Larger Bench. : DELHI CESTAT;
SERVICE TAX SECTION
2008-TIOL-554-CESTAT-DEL.pdf
M/s Nova Chemicals (International) S A Vs CCE, Kanpur (Dated : March 13, 2008)
ST - Consulting Engineer Service - Assessee is a patent holder - Signs supplementary agreement with its client for enhancing production capacity and provide technical services for the same - Revenue demands tax and imposed penalty - Assessee argues that since IPR Service has been brought under tax only from 10.9.2004, the same cannot be treated as consulting engineer service for the prior period - Since it is a relationship between a licensor and a licensee, it is prima facie a fit case for waiver of pre-deposit : DELHI CESTAT; 2008-TIOL-553-CESTAT-MUM.pdf
First Flight Couriers Ltd Vs CST, Mumbai (Dated : February 27, 2008)
ST - Courier Service - Modification of stay application - Waiver of pre-deposit of penalty of Rs 200 per day - Since entire demand with interest paid, pre-deposit of penalty waived off and recovery stayed
: MUMBAI CESTAT;
CUSTOMS SECTION
NOTIFICATION
dgft08pn001.pdf
Annual Supplement to FTP to come into force from
April 1, 2008; dgft08not001.pdf
FTP notified;
CASE LAWS
2008-TIOL-212-HC-MUM-CUS.pdf + customs hc story.pdf
Jayant Hansraj Shah Vs UoI (Dated : February 29, 2008)
Customs – seizure – provisional release of seized goods – once the provisional release order is issued under Section 110A of the Customs Act, the six month limitation to issue notice under Section 124 is not applicable - It is only in the case where no provisional order is passed for release of the seized goods and if no notice is issued under Section 124(a) for confiscation of the goods then only would Section 110 (2) apply.
Any other reading of the Section would mean that a person whose goods are seized would seek a provisional release of the goods, get an order of provisional release, allow the authorities to proceed to believe on that basis that such person seeks to release the goods provisionally and on the expiry of the period of six months if notice is not issued under Section 124(a) then contend that the terms for provisional release of the goods are no longer binding as the period of six months has expired and no notice has been served. If there be a provisional release order it is not within the jurisdiction of the respondents to proceed to issue the notice under Section 124. : BOMBAY HIGH COURT; 2008-TIOL-555-CESTAT-BANG.pdf M/s Siddharth Exports Vs CC, Cochin (Dated : November 15, 2007) Over-Valuation of export goods – Penalty justified :
BANGALORE CESTAT; |