cbecorder073_2008.pdf
Fresh charge distribution among CBEC Members + zonal charges;
CENTRAL EXCISE SECTION
2008-TIOL-552-CESTAT-MUM.pdf + scrable story.pdf
Vivek Jhangiani Vs CCE, Mumbai I (Dated : March 27, 2008)
“Scrabble” is a parlour game falling for classification under CET 9504.90 & not an “Educational Toy or Puzzle, CTH 95.03”, says Tribunal while confirming a duty demand of Rs.22.72 lakhs along with penalties.
Sale in a toy shop does not automatically make the sold item a toy, as both toys and games are sold in a toy shop, and games sold in a toy shop are different and distinct from sports goods which are sold in a sports goods shop – therefore the fact that a game is sold in a toy shop will not by itself make it a toy.
In the present case, there is no dispute that Scrabble is played in parlours in homes/houses and in clubs, holiday resorts etc. especially when inclement weather hampers or prevents outdoor activities;
“Scrabble” is a parlour game falling for classification under CET sub-heading 9504.90 : MUMBAI CESTAT; 2008-TIOL-551-CESTAT-MUM.pdf
Prakash M Patel Vs CCE, Nashik (Dated : January 18, 2008)
Since the main appeal filed by the company has been admitted, pre-deposit of penalty waived. : MUMBAI CESTAT; 2008-TIOL-550-CESTAT-MUM.pdf
Vishwadeep Pressparts Pvt Ltd Vs CCE, Pune I (Dated : January 29, 2008) Once the duty demand stands confirmed by the Commissioner (Appeals) and his order has not been challenged, the question of entertaining a claim for refund does not arise.
: MUMBAI
CESTAT;
SERVICE TAX SECTION
2008-TIOL-548-CESTAT-KOL.pdf
CCE & C, Patna Vs M/s Advantage Media Consultant (Dated : March 19, 2008)
ST - Advertising Service - Assessees provide service to Govt undertaking which does not pay service tax - Commissioner(A) orders to treat the gross amount inclusive of service tax but Revenue for collecting tax on gross amount - It is a time-tested principle which has been legislated vide Sec 67(2) in 2006 and the total compensation received should be treated as inclusive of service tax - Revenue's appeal dismissed : KOLKATA CESTAT;
2008-TIOL-547-CESTAT-DEL.pdf Mokha Builders & Promoters Vs CCE, Bhopal (Dated : January 21, 2008)
ST - Construction of residential complex service - Tax paid and refund application filed - Revenue rejects - Since the findings of the adjudicating authority is not under challenge and the sale deed entered into before the construction of multi-storied complex does talk about service tax, assessee's appeal rejected
: DELHI CESTAT;
CUSTOMS SECTION
NOTIFICATION cnt08_036.pdf
Amends 63/94 for trade entry point with B'desh;
CASE LAWS 2008-TIOL-70-SC-CUS.pdf + reimport story.pdf
Super Cassettes Industries Ltd Vs CC, New Delhi (Dated : March 10, 2008)
Customs – re-import: A reading of Section 20 makes it abundantly clear that the goods re-imported after exportation would be liable to duty and be subject to all the conditions and restrictions to which goods of the like kind and value are liable or subject on the importation thereof. : SUPREME COURT;
2008-TIOL-549-CESTAT-MUM.pdf CC (Import), Mumbai II Vs M/s S Kumar Nationwide Ltd (Dated : January 18, 2008) Route of filing the refund application for the amount of excess duty paid without challenging the assessment of bills of entries is not permissible in view of SC decision in Priya Blue Industries [ 2004-TIOL-78-SC-CUS ] – Order sanctioning refund set aside & Revenue appeal allowed. : MUMBAI CESTAT; |