BUDGET ANALYSIS 2008-09
eou story.pdf
Duty computation for DTA sale by EoU with effect from March 1, 2008; st prepare.pdf
Let's welcome 'Service Tax Return Preparer' Scheme; it amendment story.pdf
Budget 2008: Income Tax assessees are in for adjustments and penalty
galore with retrospective amendment; Berger Paint decision gone;
rate story.pdf
Effective income tax rates unraveled for all;
unni story.pdf
Arrear recovery and service tax dispute resolution scheme, 2008;
sunday story.pdf
RBI asks rural banks to identify suspicious accounts being used by terrorist outfits and assist Financial Intelligence Unit;
Case Laws 2008-TIOL-106-ITAT-RANCHI.pdf
Income Tax - Assessee's sister concern pays rack charges in cash to railways on behalf of assessee to get the goods released as assessee didn't have enough money at the relevant time which is subsequently paid back in cash - A.O. treats it as loan transaction in cash in violation of Sec.269SS and 269T and imposes penalty u/s 271D and 271E - CIT(A) deletes the penalty on the ground that it is not a case of loan transaction - Sec. 269SS and 269T require that any loan or deposit taken or repaid in excess of Rs.20,000 should be done by way of crossed cheque or bank draft and any contravention of the same would entail levying of penalty u/s 271D & 271E respectively - In the instant case no loan was taken or repaid but it was a case of payment in cash to railways for release of goods by sister concern due to urgency of circumstances which was subsequently repaid by assessee - thus it was just a case of business expenses incurred by sister concern on behalf of assessee and repayment of same and not a case of taking and repayment of loan - Revenue's appeal dismissed - (Para 3,5,6,8).: RANCHI ITAT; 2008-TIOL-321-CESTAT-BANG.pdf
Central Excise - Clandestine removal - Demand of Duty based on furnace oil consumption cannot be confirmed: BANGALORE
CESTAT ;
2008-TIOL-322-CESTAT-MAD.pdf
Warehoused goods – interest: As there was no liability to duty on the goods cleared from the warehouse in terms of Section 61 (2)(ii) there cannot be a demand of interest for the clearances from the appellants. The appellants are therefore eligible for refund of the interest they had paid. The appellants shall also be entitled to interest in terms of Section 27 A of the Customs Act, 1962 .: CHENNAI CESTAT;
NOTIFICATION RBI Notification.pdf
Know Your Customer (KYC) Norms / Anti-Money Laundering (AML) Standards / Combating of Financing of Terrorism (CFT)- RRBs;
it08not030.pdf
Expenditure of scientific researc: Production of seeds notified u/s 35; it08not029.pdf
Expenditure of scientific researc: Production of agricultural implements notified; Mixed Buzz
mbuzz392.pdf
Gandhigiri by Central Excise Officers; |