CENTRAL
EXCISE SECTION
2008-TIOL-289-CESTAT-MAD.pdf
• The
Revenue, after having accepted payment of duty by the principal
manufacturer in terms of Notification No.214/86-CE ibid, could
not have demanded interest thereon from the job worker.
• In
the present appeal, the grievance of the job worker is against
this demand of interest as well as against the confirmation of
demand of duty against them.
• Neither
of these demands is sustainable against the job worker on the
facts of this case: CHENNAI CESTAT:
2008-TIOL-288-CESTAT-MAD.pdf
Subsequent issue of Credit Notes does not prove
that incidence of duty was not passed on: CHENNAI CESTAT;
2008-TIOL-285-CESTAT-MAD.pdf
Arithmetical
mistake does not prove intent to evade – facts informed to the dept – no suppression – clearance to sister unit – Revenue
neutral: CHENNAI CESTAT; 2008-TIOL-284-CESTAT-MAD.pdf
Credit not deniable merely because it was taken on a photo copy of the Bill of Entry: CHENNAI
CESTAT;
SERVICE TAX SECTION
2008-TIOL-290-CESTAT-DEL.pdf
ST - Auxiliary insurance service - Revenue raises
demand on what the assessee claims as allowable reimbursement paid
to agents in the form of club expenditure - Going by Board clarification,
the assessee's case prima facie looks backed by Board clarification
- Waiver of pre-deposit gratned: DELHI CESTAT;
2008-TIOL-286-CESTAT-DEL.pdf
ST - IUC Service - Prior to the amended definition of Telecommunication service, assessee argues, IUC was clarified by the Board that it was not covered under service tax - Pre-deposit waived off and stay granted
: DELHI
CESTAT;
CUSTOMS SECTION
2008-TIOL-287-CESTAT-MAD.pdf
Import
of second hand photo copiers – penalty reduced: CHENNAI CESTAT; |