CENTRAL
EXCISE SECTION
2008-TIOL-252-CESTAT-DEL.pdf
Excise
- Assessee clears scrap of capital goods - Demand and penalty
on ground that the assessee cleared old machinery in the garb
of scrap - Commissioner(A) upholds the order - A perusal of show
cause notice clearly shows that it alleged clearance of scrap
of capital goods whereas lower authorities came to a finding
that appellant cleared old machinery in the guise of scrap which
is beyond the scope of show cause notice thus such a finding
is not sustainable and moreover duty on waste and scrap of capital
goods in the relevant period is unsustainable in absence of charging
provision and thus demand of duty is invalid - Assessee's appeal
allowed.: DELHI CESTAT; 2008-TIOL-251-CESTAT-AHM.pdf
Valuation – Section
4 prior to 28.09.1996 - Merely because assessee have sold the
goods at lower price to other group companies does not mean that
the said price is not correct or the same is not the sole consideration
for the sale of such goods.
There
is no allegation by the department that there is any mutuality
of interest between the respondents and the unit of the group
who has purchased goods from them – Revenue
appeal rejected.: AHMEDABAD
CESTAT;
2008-TIOL-248-CESTAT-DEL.pdf
Central
Excise - Cenvat credit - Revenue denies and penalty levied -
Commissioner(A) upholds the order - Waiver of pre-deposit sought
on the ground that a reference is made on the issue by the Division
Bench to a larger bench not agreeing with the interprtation given
by coordinate bench of Tribunal in an earlier decision and alternatively
on the ground that goods are sold at the port and therefore the
place of removal is not to be treated to be factory of appellant
- Merely because a reference is made on an opposite view by the
Division bench it does not mean there is a conflict of judicial
precedent and the earlier decision will remain binding unless overruled
and it is not appropriate in such cases to waive predeposit - However
as per CBEC circular dated 23.8.07 (No.97/8/2002) if it can be
established by the claimant of credit that sale and transfer of
property in goods took place at some other place, then credit of
service tax paid on transportation of goods upto such place is
admissible and since in the instant case property to the buyer
was transferred at the port, a prima facie case is made for waiver
of pre-deposit thus stay on recovery of cenvat credit and penalty
without any requirement of pre-deposit granted - Assessee's application
allowed: DELHI
CESTAT;
2008-TIOL-247-CESTAT-MAD.pdf
Central
Excise – Penalty under Section 11 AC – duty
deposited before issue of the show cause notice – Commissioner
(Appeals) order reducing the penalty is upheld – modified
penalty is fair and justified on an assessment of the over all
circumstances in which the assessee committed the offence – appellants'
appeal for waiver of penalty and revenue's appeal seeking equal
penalty dismissed: CHENNAI
CESTAT;
SERVICE TAX SECTION
2008-TIOL-249-CESTAT-DEL.pdf
Service
Tax - Penalty imposed - Same upheld by adjudicating authority
- Assessee argues no distinction between those who seek registration
on their own and those who take registration in view of pending
proceedings thus there is no basis for imposing penalty - Tribunal
sets aside the impugned order - Comm. revises the original adjudication
order and imposes penalty u/s 76 - Appellant objects and appeals
on the ground that revision of set aside impugned order is unsustainable
- Revenue contends that Tribunal set aside penalty in that order
and not the order - Tribunal had set aside the adjudication order
thus revision by Comm. of such set aside order is not maintainable
- Assessee's appeal allowed: DELHI
CESTAT;
CUSTOMS SECTION
2008-TIOL-253-CESTAT-MAD.pdf
Customs – smuggling
of gold – the appellants had involved themselves
in a grave offence of smuggling more than a quintal of
gold of foreign origin into India for monetary consideration
- the penalties imposed on them cannot be held to be harsh
or unjustified.:
CHENNAI CESTAT;
2008-TIOL-250-CESTAT-BANG.pdf
Customs
- Unjust enrichment - Bar to refund claims not applicable to
Govt undertaking: BANGALORE
CESTAT; |