CENTRAL
EXCISE SECTION
2008-TIOL-179-CESTAT-MUM.pdf + National Plastics
Story.pdf
De
novo order conveying the Tribunal's findings on the merits of
the case is an error apparent on record & would defeat the
very purpose of remand – Findings deleted by Tribunal on
ROM application: MUMBAI CESTAT;
2008-TIOL-178-CESTAT-DEL.pdf
Central Excise - Appellant, engaged in the business of manufacture
of sugar and molasses, sells scrap of capital goods - Demand for
duty on sale of scrap alongwith penalty and interest for violation
of Rule 3(4) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2001 - No provision in Cenvat
Credit Rules for charging duty on scrap of capital goods and Rule
3(4) merely lays down that where inputs/ capital goods are cleared
by the assessee as such that he will be liable to reverse the credit/pay
duty thereof and not when waste and scrap of capital goods is cleared
as in the instant case - Assessee's appeal allowed: DELHI
CESTAT;
2008-TIOL-176-CESTAT-MAD.pdf
Central
Excise – Cenvat Credit on additional duty of customs debited in DEPB under Notification 34/97 Cus – in
view of the larger bench ruling in Essar Steel Limited, credit
is not admissible.
Penalty
- there was no consensus on the issue whether modvat credit was
available to CVD paid by credit in the DEPB scrip among various
benches of the Tribunal - The issue was ultimately resolved by
the decision of the Larger Bench in Essar Steel Ltd. Vs. Commissioner
of Central Excise, Vishakhapatnam - In the circumstances the
assessee cannot be held to have availed undue credit deliberately – revenue
appeals seeking restoration of penalties vacated by the Commissioner(Appeals)
set aside.: CHENNAI CESTAT;
SERVICE TAX SECTION
2008-TIOL-177-CESTAT-DEL.pdf
ST - GTA Service - Can Cenvat credit be utilised for payment of
ST by service recipient? - Revenue says no as assessee did not
provide any output service - Issue already settled in favour of
the assessee: DELHI CESTAT;
2008-TIOL-174-CESTAT-DEL.pdf
ST - GTA Service - Cenvat credit utilised for payment of ST on input service - Revenue says no as assessee did not provide any output service - Issue already settled in favour of the assessee: DELHI CESTAT;
CUSTOMS SECTION
2008-TIOL-175-CESTAT-MAD.pdf
Customs – Penalty under Section 112(a) of the Customs Act imposed on the appellant on the ground of involving in incriminating transactions – there
is no finding in the Order-In-Original that the appellants had
in any way abetted the offence by which the impugned goods had
become liable to confiscation.: CHENNAI CESTAT; |