|
CENTRAL
EXCISE SECTION
CIRCULAR excircular861.doc
Chennai LTU: CBEC asks LTUs to file Nov returns of excise and Service Tax with erstwhile jurisdictional officers; CASE LAWS 2007-TIOL-219-SC-CX.doc + sc story.doc
Valuation is not an exact science. Some amount of guess work exists in valuation.
The Department may apply different methods of valuation, but it has to ultimately ascertain by applying rule of convergence the estimated ad valorem value which would constitute the basis of assessable value.:
SUPREME COURT;
2007-TIOL-1877-CESTAT-BANG.doc
Central Excise - refund - rejected on the ground of unjust enrichment - the assessee claims the assessements were provisional - The fact pertaining to the duty having been paid under protest or that the assessments were provisional has not been brought out in the Commissioner(Appeal)'s order and this aspect requires to be examined - when the assessments were provisional, the presumption that duty has not been passed on to the customer in terms of the judgment cited should be considered by the authorities -the impugned orders were set aside and the matter remanded to the original authority: BANGALORE CESTAT; 2007-TIOL-1876-CESTAT-BANG.doc
Central Excise - duty on Plantomycin repacked and sold in unit packs - discounts given by credit notes allowed as deduction - demand of interest and penalty - since the notice was issued after 14.5.2001, the provisions of interest under Section 11AB are not applicable - Since the assessee paid entire duty before adjudication, the interest under Section 11AA is also not applicable - demand of interest set aside - penalty also set aside as there in no evidence of intention to evade payment of duty: BANGALORE CESTAT; 2007-TIOL-1875-CESTAT-BANG.doc
Central Excise - valuation - petroleum products sold to company owned company operated outlets (COCOs) - when there is transfer of part of production to another plant of same assessee and balance production sold to independent buyers, during such circumstances Rule 8 of Central Excise (Valuation) Rules, 2000 are not applicable and the value arrived by the assessee should be accepted: BANGALORE CESTAT;
SERVICE
TAX SECTION
2007-TIOL-1874-CESTAT-BANG.doc
Service Tax - photography services - Elements of inputs used and shown in the invoice, not includable for levy of service tax. Appeal allowed: BANGALORE CESTAT; 2007-TIOL-1873-CESTAT-BANG.doc
Service tax - General Insurance Business - despite granting 18 adjournments to the appellants, they have on one pretext or the other, not been pursuing the matter - They have not produced any specific Circular or Notification issued by the Central Govt. granting them exemption from the service tax and the reference made by the appellants for exemption under Section 36 of the General Insurance Business (Nationalization) Act is not applicable for levy of service tax under the Finance Act, 1994 - appeal rejected: BANGALORE CESTAT; CUSTOMS
SECTION
CIRCULAR
cuscir07_43.doc
Supplies from DTA to SEZ: Who can sanction drawback? - CBEC clarifies;
NOTIFICATION cnt07_118.doc
Drawback rates for lamps made of brass, copper,
iron & aluminium;
cnt07_117.doc
Zinc Oxide (100% purity) allocated sub-heading in customs tariff; CASE LAWS 2007-TIOL-218-SC-NDPS.doc + dri story.doc
The NDPS Act is a penal statute. It invades the rights of an accused to a large extent. if an arrest or search contemplated under these provisions of NDPS Act has to be carried out, the same can be done only by competent and empowered Magistrates or Officers mentioned thereunder . Draconian provision which may lead to a harsh sentence having regard to the doctrine of 'due process' as adumbrated under Article 21 of the Constitution of India require striking of balance between the need of law and enforcement thereof, on the one hand, and protection of citizen from oppression and injustice on the other. A distinction therefor must be borne in mind that a search conducted on the basis of a prior information and a case where the authority comes across a case of commission of an offence under the Act accidentally or per chance: SUPREME COURT;
2007-TIOL-1878-CESTAT-BANG.doc + gmr story.doc Customs - valuation - valuation of parts imported under Rotable exchange programme- the appellant should return the used parts to the overseas supplier by declaring the value as one third of the value of the parts imported - no export sale proceeds were received by the appellant for the returned parts - value of the used parts returned has to be added to the price of the parts imported - demand upheld: BANGALORE CESTAT; |