|
CENTRAL
EXCISE SECTION
2007-TIOL-217-SC-CX.doc + sc story.doc Central Excise - manufacture - As to what constitutes manufacture would depend upon the facts of each case. Condensing units were manufactured by the appellant at its factory at New Delhi and the cooling units were procured from the local market for which the electrical motors were supplied by the appellant. Neither the condensing unit nor the cooling unit by itself is a complete air conditioner. It is only when these two, i.e. condensing unit and cooling units are put together the complete unit of air conditioner fit for use came into existence at the Kanjumarg workshop. Air conditioner is a commercially new article than either the condensing unit or the cooling unit:SUPREME COURT;
2007-TIOL-1862-CESTAT-MUM.doc
Section 11B & 11BB are to be read together - Appellant filed a refund claim in June 1997 disputing the amount paid by him at the insistence of the C.Ex officers - issue finally settled in August 2005 by the Tribunal - refund granted within three months of the Tribunal order - Interest payable for the period after three months from filing the refund claim at rates prevailing during the period in view of LB decision in Jayanta Glass Ltd., and Rajasthan HC decision in the case of J.K. Cement Works.:MUMBAI CESTAT; 2007-TIOL-1861-CESTAT-BANG.doc Central Excise - SSI exemption - It is established that appellants during the relevant period have not crossed the exemption limit. Hence demand not sustainable. (para 11)
Clandestine clearance - Evidence - Demand is based solely on private records. No direct or indirect evidence adduced by department by way of procurement of raw materials /sale of finished goods / consideration received for sale. No evidence to conclude clandestine clearance. Suspicion is no substitute for evidence. Demand set aside due to lack of evidence:BANGALORE CESTAT;
2007-TIOL-1860-CESTAT-MUM.doc
'Motor Spirit' blended with 5% ethanol - Duty for the period 01/07/2004 to 03/08/2004 - as Section 11C notification has been issued, no cause for confirmation of duty demand & imposition of penalty/interest - Appeals allowed:MUMBAI
CESTAT;
SERVICE
TAX SECTION
2007-TIOL-1866-CESTAT-MUM.doc + catering story.doc
Outdoor Catering Services provided in the company canteen whether indirectly assists manufacturing activities - Cenvat Credit eligibility - No prima facie case for complete waiver of amounts - Tribunal orders pre-deposit:MUMBAI CESTAT; 2007-TIOL-1865-CESTAT-BANG.doc
Service Tax is not leviable when a foreign company has transferred technology to the Indian Company for valuable consideration:BANGALORE CESTAT;
CUSTOMS
SECTION
2007-TIOL-1864-CESTAT-MUM.doc + dumping story.doc
Anti-dumping duty during the "interregnum period" - Matter referred to Larger Bench of Tribunal in view of conflicting decisions in Harsh International 2007-TIOL-1232-CESTAT-MUM & Bansilal Leisure Parks Ltd. 2007-TIOL-1388-CESTAT-DEL:MUMBAI CESTAT; 2007-TIOL-1863-CESTAT-BANG.doc
Customs - Imports - Classification / Valuation - Principles of natural Justice - Commissioner (Appeals) has not given any findings and merely accepted the OIO by agreeing with the findings of the original adjudicating authority. Commissioner (Appeals) is required to examine every submission and evidence adduced. Failure to do so results in a non-speaking order and violates the principles of natural justice. Matter remanded to Commissioner (Appeals).:BANGALORE CESTAT; |