CENTRAL
EXCISE SECTION
2007-TIOL-1609-CESTAT-MUM.doc + excise story.doc
Commissioner
making a new case on a basis that is altogether different from
that in the demand made - Prima facie strong case on merits -
Pre-deposit of duty & penalty
dispensed by Tribunal and stay granted. CESTAT MUMBAI;
2007-TIOL-1608-CESTAT-BANG.doc
Central
Excise Cenvat - when credit is reversed, exemption has to be
allowed: BANGALORE CESTAT;
2007-TIOL-1602-CESTAT-DEL.doc
Bar of unjust enrichment is applicable even in case of issuance of credit notes -The certificates issued by the customers did not indicate that the excess duty was not passed on to the customers - The appellants did not produce any evidence showing that the amounts in question have not been passed on to the customers- Refund claim correctly rejected on grounds of unjust enrichment : DELHI CESTAT; 2007-TIOL-1601-CESTAT-DEL.doc
Central Excise - Appellant assessee, a manufacturer of sugar molasses, claims refund of education cess paid on stock lying on 8.7.2004 when removed under subsequent invoices as the cess was leviable only on production after that date - Revenue rejects on the ground that incidence of taxation is passed on to the customers - Assessee objects on the ground that there is no price variation of sales prior and subsequent to the cess thus doctrine of unjust enrichment cannot be invoked - Uniformity in prices before and after imposition of cess cannot lead to an inference that incidence of duty was not passed to the customers as uniformity could be due to various factors and moreover there is clear documentary evidence of recovery of cess in the instant case in the form of invoices reflecting education cess thus mere assertion that cess was borne by appellant cannot help him - Assessee's appeal dismissed - (Para 5,6). :
DELHI CESTAT;
SERVICE
TAX SECTION
2007-TIOL-1606-CESTAT-MAD.doc
Service tax - Clearing and forwarding agent -
the vacillating stand of the department is abundantly clear from
the documents on record -by taking different views at different
points of time as regards the nature of the service rendered by
the appellants, the departmental authorities themselves landed
the assessee in total chaos and confusion - they are not entitled
to invoke extended period of limitation: MADRAS CESTAT; 2007-TIOL-1603-CESTAT-MUM.doc
ST - GTA Service - Exemption to SSI unit - Assessee claims refund of serive tax paid ''under protest'' - Lower authorities accept the contention but refund claim rejected on the ground of unjust enrichment - Since the CA has certified that the incidence of tax was borne by the assessee, refund claim is valid - Revenue's appeal dismissed : MUMBAI CESTAT;
CUSTOMS
SECTION
NOTIFICATION
dgft07pn071.doc
Focus Market Scheme benefits : DGFT amends policy for acceptance of tracking report from goods carrier as evidence of exports; CASE LAWS 2007-TIOL-1604-CESTAT-BANG.doc + refund story.doc Customs - refund - Claim filed before finalization of provisional assessment - effective
challenge.
Unjust
Enrichment - Chartered Accountant's certificate can be accepted
as proof. :
BANAGALORE CESTAT;
2007-TIOL-1607-CESTAT-AHM.doc
The amount paid towards duty at the time of provisional
release of seized goods is only a 'deposit': AHMEDABAD CESTAT; |