CENTRAL
EXCISE SECTION
2007-TIOL-1597-CESTAT-MAD.doc
Lube oil waste, spent activated carbon and spent activated alumina - not excisable: MADRAS CESTAT; 2007-TIOL-1596-CESTAT-MAD.doc
Inputs received from SSI units at concessional rate, cleared as such - CENVAT Credit taken Reversed - Department wants reversal of 16% instead of concessional rate - reversal by assessee is Good Compliance: MADRAS CESTAT; 2007-TIOL-1595-CESTAT-MAD.doc
Central
Excise - the order of Assistant Commissioner on classification was
not challenged by the revenue and thus became final - Consequential
refund was rejected by the original authority on the ground of unjust
enrichment - the Commissioner (Appeal) can not reject the refund
on the ground of classification - matter remanded to examine unjust
enrichment: MADRAS CESTAT;
SERVICE
TAX SECTION
2007-TIOL-1600-CESTAT-MUM.doc + works contract story.doc
Whether a contract for construction is a Works Contract on a turnkey basis & not a Consultancy contract - conflicting decisions hence matter referred to Larger Bench of Tribunal.
Conflicting decision in L & T Ltd. 2006-TIOL-490-CESTAT-MUM & BSBK P.Ltd. 2006-TIOL-1538-CESTAT-DEL - matter referred to President for constituting a Larger Benc :
MUMBAI CESTAT;
2007-TIOL-1599-CESTAT-MAD.doc
Service Tax paid before SCN - no attempt to evade tax - Commissioner (A) reduces equal penalty - Revenue appeal for higher penalty dismissed. : MADRAS CESTAT;
CUSTOMS
SECTION
NOTIFICATION
dgft07pn070.doc
SION corrections - Annexure A amended
dgft07pn069.doc
SION rate for engg product amended
dgft07pn067.doc
SION rates for chemical & allied products amended;
CASE LAWS 2007-TIOL-597-HC-DEL-AD.doc + essar story.doc
Anti dumping - DGAD's decision to terminate anti-dumping investigation into imports of Hot rolled coils upheld - All reasonable opportunities given and well reasoned order passed - loss to steel manufacturers was due to inefficiency, not dumping: DELHI HIGH COURT;
2007-TIOL-1598-CESTAT-MAD.doc Customs - confiscation of foreign currency - it is reasonable to conclude that the appellant has procured foreign exchange and carried the same which was much beyond the permissible limit - The confiscation of the foreign exchange and imposition of penalty are justified - However, the confiscated currency is ordered to be released on payment of fine of Rs one lakh: MADRAS CESTAT; |