rlt082-Part5.pdf
RLT
Case laws Headnotes;
CENTRAL
EXCISE SECTION
2007-TIOL-1503-CESTAT-AHM.doc
Central Excise - clandestine clearances - it is an admitted case of collusion between the processing unit and the merchant manufacturers which resulted in unaccounted production and clandestine removal of the excisable goods without payment of duty and the intention to evade excise is very clear - There is full justification for imposition of penalty equal to the duty under Section 11AC : CESTAT;
2007-TIOL-1508-CESTAT-SRINAGAR.doc
Central Excise - valuation - deduction of machine user charges allowed in view of the earlier CESTAT orders - in respect of transportation charges, matter remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) as the order was passed without going into the relevant records : CESTAT;
SERVICE
TAX SECTION
NOTIFICATION
stnot07_041.doc
Export of services : CBEC further grants refund for payment of service tax on insurance service; CASE LAWS 2007-TIOL-1511-CESTAT-DEL.doc + gta story.doc Service tax - Goods Transport operators - show cause notice issued on 29.11.2002 as per the pre-amended provisions alleging that the returns were not filed and tax not paid - No effort was made by the Revenue to issue a revised show cause notice in the context of extended date for filing the returns and payment of service tax as provided under the Finance Act 2003 -the revenue ought to have been more vigilant by revising the notices which were earlier issued to bring them in tune with the new provisions - Revenue appeal dismissed: CESTAT;
CUSTOMS
SECTION
NOTIFICATION
cnt07_102.doc
CBEC
amends Not 39/2005-Cus (NT) for review cases;
dgft07pn060.doc
DGFT replaces para 4.22 in HP and alters export obligations fulfilment period; CASE LAWS 2007-TIOL-1510-CESTAT-DEL.doc Refund of duty, if any, can be claimed only by the importing company who paid the duty - The appellant cannot have a claim for refund of the amount on the ground that he had advanced the amount to the importer : CESTAT;
|