ORDER
order255_2007.doc
CBEC issue transfer order of Addl/JC + AC/DC order ;
CENTRAL
EXCISE SECTION
2007-TIOL-553-HC-RAJ-CX.doc
Education cess - Notification grants rebate - Board amends Notification inserting education cess as duty of excise - Clarificatory - Rebate is available to the assessee under the basic Notification even before the amendment came into effect - Since education cess was levied as duty of central excise, no separate notification required for providing rebate as per Notification No 40/2001-CE (NT) and 19/2004-CE(NT) - Assessee's appeal allowed : HIGH COURT;
2007-TIOL-1503-CESTAT-AHM.doc
Central Excise - clandestine clearances - it is an admitted case of collusion between the processing unit and the merchant manufacturers which resulted in unaccounted production and clandestine removal of the excisable goods without payment of duty and the intention to evade excise is very clear - There is full justification for imposition of penalty equal to the duty under Section 11AC : CESTAT; 2007-TIOL-1502-CESTAT-AHM.doc
Central Excise - Cenvat Credit - refund of accumulated credit due to exporting the final products - The credit lying in RG-23 account accumulated arising out of exports is akin to credit in the PLA - After introduction of compounded levy scheme, the assessee was not in a position to utilize the credit - Commissioner (Appeals) order that the refunds were not admissible is not legally sustainable : CESTAT; 2007-TIOL-1501-CESTAT-AHM.doc Transformers supplied to BARC - eligible for exemption under Notification 10/97 CE -issue no longer res integra - Tribunal decision in Andrew Yule and Danke Products followed.
Notification 3/2001CE - Transformers neither Biogas plant nor engine, at the most they can be considered as parts - since parts not covered under the notification, benefit not available - Modvat reversed by treating such clearances as exempted to be restored : CESTAT;
2007-TIOL-1500-CESTAT-AHM.doc
Branded goods - Appellant affixing various free flowing brands "Amar", "Jyoti", "Zenith", "Texflow", "Bison", "KRI" & "Super" etc based on customers requirements depending upon which brand was running successfully in that region - brand names not owned by any person - if the brand name is not owned by any particular person, use thereof will not deprive the unit of the benefit of the small scale exemption notification - Board Circular 52/52/94-CX dated 1.9.94 relied upon : CESTAT; SERVICE
TAX SECTION
2007-TIOL-1507-CESTAT-MUM.doc + finance bill story.doc
Explanation to Clause 82 of the Finance Bill, 2005 comes to rescue - Appellant not liable to interest / penalty : CESTAT; 2007-TIOL-1506-CESTAT-DEL.doc ST - Cenvat credit on outward freight - Revenue denied it as it was taken on the transport service after duty paid removal of goods - Whether the freight formed part of the AV is not verified, the issue remanded : CESTAT;
CUSTOMS
SECTION
NOTIFICATION
dgft07not032.doc
DGFT allows EoU/STP/BTP units to subcontract part of production abroad and send intermediate goods without permission; dgft07not031.doc
Restriction on export of onions; dgft07pn059.doc
Format for goods to be sent abroad for jobwork; CASE LAWS
2007-TIOL-1505-CESTAT-AHM.doc + depb story.doc
Export overvaluation for undue DEPB benefit - CESTAT by majority sets aside the denial of DEBP: CESTAT; 2007-TIOL-1504-CESTAT-DEL.doc There is no dispute that the conditions as laid down in the DGFT Notification dated 11.9.2006 have been complied with by the importer - So, the contention of the Revenue to deny the benefit of exemption notification on the ground that shipment had not been effected prior to 2.6.2006 is totally unwarranted, inconsistent and extraneous : CESTAT; |