rlt082-Part1.pdf
+ rlt081-Part9.pdf
Headnotes
of latest RLT case laws;
CENTRAL
EXCISE SECTION
2007-TIOL-1267-CESTAT-MAD.doc
+ excise
story.doc
Central
Excise - Job work - Under Notification No. 214/86-C.E, it was the
liability of the raw material supplier to pay duty of excise on
the product of job work when removed from his factory for home consumption;
2007-TIOL-1266-CESTAT-BANG.doc
Central
Excise - Valuation - The amount received by respondents has no connection
with the final product manufactured by them - In view of the settled
decisions they are not includible in the assessable value - No merit
in the appeal;
2007-TIOL-1265-CESTAT-BANG.doc
Central
Excise - P or P Medicines - physician samples - Duty is leviable
on the physician's samples cleared free of cost - No merit in the
appeal;
2007-TIOL-1262-CESTAT-SRINAGAR.doc
Excise
exemption - Notification No. 56/2002 dated 14.11.2002 - Refund of
education cess alongwith excise duty exempted - Revenue allows refund
of excise duty paid but not education cess on the ground that Finance
Act 2002 under which the said cess is payable is not mentioned in
the notification - Education cess is a piggyback duty levied on
aggregate of all excise duties payable and does not stand on its
own - unless excise duty is levied and collected there can be no
question of collection of education cess, thus there is no need
to specifically mention exemption of education cess in the notification
- Appeal allowed - (Para 6.2,7.2,8.1,9):Cestat; .
2007-TIOL-1261-CESTAT-DEL.doc
Refund
of Additional duty of Excise (T&TA) under rule 5 of the Cenvat
Credit Rules - refund can not be denied on the ground that the goods
were not exported under bond and rebate was already granted on the
duty paid on final products - refund allowed under rule 5 of Cenvat
Credit Rules - Tribunal order in case of M/s Indo Dane Textile Industries
followed ( 2007-TIOL-559-CESTAT-DEL
):Cestat;
2007-TIOL-1260-CESTAT-KOL.doc
Birla
Tyres - As far as applicability of Notification is concerned, answer
to that question becomes redundant when the goods are held non excisable
:Cestat;
SERVICE
TAX SECTION
2007-TIOL-1263-CESTAT-BANG.doc
Service
tax - Consulting Engineer Services - In view of the settled decisions
the amounts received towards royalty for technical know how from
foreign collaborator does not come within the ambit of consulting
engineer services for levy of Service Tax;
2007-TIOL-1257-CESTAT-DEL.doc
ST
- Manpower Recruitment Agency - Assessee argues they only provided
labour on contract and their services are not covered under Manpower
Recruitment Service - Since the agreement with the client clearly
refers to collection of service tax on 'total wages' but the same
was not done by the assessee, pre-deposit of the entire demand ordered
:Cestat;
CUSTOMS
SECTION
NOTIFICATION
cnt07_090.doc
CBEC revises tariff value of brass scarp;
dgft07cir009.doc
Product
not covered by any EPC / Commodity Board - FIEO to issue RCMC;
CASE
LAWS
2007-TIOL-1264-CESTAT-BANG.doc
Customs
- Import of Second hand photo copying Machines -regarding the requirement
of licence for import, the Tribunal decision which was upheld by
two High Courts is in favour of the importer - Department appeal
dismissed;
2007-TIOL-1259-CESTAT-MAD.doc
Customs
- Re-export of imported goods received for jobbing - Law does not
compel a person to do the impossible - The appellant could not discharge
export obligations for the reasons beyond their control - Entitled
for benefits of exemption notification :Cestat;
2007-TIOL-1258-CESTAT-DEL.doc
Customs
Duty - DEPB - Appellants overvalue the consignment of shoes for
export in order to take advantage of DEPB scheme - Revenue ascertains
correct present market value of goods and imposes penalty and also
reopens the assessment of earlier export of automobile parts - Appellant
objects to reopening of earlier assessment on the ground that once
export has been made and foreign exchange realised, assessment in
case of earlier exports can't be reopened - Overvaluation of goods
by the appellant to misutilize the scheme is proved which in itself
is a valid ground for reopening the earlier cases of export - Appellant's
appeal rejected - (Para 6).
Revenue
seeks to impose penalties on proprietors of the firm alongwith the
penalty imposed on the firms - Its a settled law that the firm doesn't
have a distinct entity from its partners and once penalty has been
imposed on the firms, the same can't be levied on the partners also
- Revenue's appeal rejected - (Para 7):Cestat; |