|
CENTRAL
EXCISE SECTION
2007-TIOL-1105-CESTAT-MUM.doc + audit story.doc
Recovery of Audit fees under section 11 of CEA'44 can be made by adjustment of refund payable to the particular person and not from another unit of the same company :Cestat;
2007-TIOL-1104-CESTAT-DEL.doc
Central Excise - Valuation - Clearance of goods under both Sections 4 & 4A - Revenue insists on application of only Sec 4A - Demand raised for differential duty - Sec.4 is resorted to when clearances are in bulk and in such clearances there is no requirement to declare retail prices on packages u/r 34 of Standards of Weights & Measures (Packages Commodity) Rules, 1977 - In the instant case valuation u/s 4 was done when clearances were made in bulk for industrial use wherein Sec.4A has no applicability -Revenue's appeal rejected - (Para 6,7) :Cestat;
2007-TIOL-1103-CESTAT-KOL.doc
Annual Capacity Determination – when the order remained unchallenged, it cannot be agitated at a belated stage :Cestat;
SERVICE
TAX SECTION
2007-TIOL-1100-CESTAT-BANG.doc
Service Tax - Stay - Security Services - No ground for seeking waiver of penalty - Pre-deposit of Rs.25,000/- to be paid within specified period ordered :Cestat; 2007-TIOL-1099-CESTAT-BANG.doc
Service Tax - Stay/Dispensation of pre-deposit - Property Management Services -- Security agency service is a part of services done by the appellant under property management service and can not be bifurcated for taxing separately - prima facie, the appellants have strong case on merits - Stay granted
:Cestat;
2007-TIOL-1098-CESTAT-BANG.doc
Service Tax - Consulting Engineer Services - In view of the settled decisions, the activities undertaken by the appellant are not taxable as consulting engineering services - appeal allowed with consequential relief
:Cestat;
CUSTOMS
SECTION
NOTIFICATION
ctariff07_093.doc
CBEC exempts a few IT products like electronic integrated circuits from Customs duty; CASE LAWS 2007-TIOL-430-HC-MUM-CUS.doc + appraiser hc story.doc
Customs appraiser's prosecution quashed - When departmental adjudication fails, on the same facts, no prosecution - It would be an abuse of process of the Court to allow any action which would result in injustice and prevent promotion of justice: HC; 2007-TIOL-1102-CESTAT-MAD.doc
Party's counter to the Department's appeal is not cross objection contemplated under Section 129A(4) of the Customs Act - certified copies of the order be circulated for future guidance of the personnel concerned including the Assistant Registrar of CESTAT:Cestat;
2007-TIOL-1101-CESTAT-MAD.doc
Customs - Penalty - Section 114 (i) of the Customs Act does not contemplate penalty for negligence - In view of the settled decisions the appeals are allowed :Cestat; |