
CENTRAL
EXCISE SECTION
2007-TIOL-968-CESTAT-DEL.doc
Central Excise - Appellant removes certain inputs on which duty credit is taken as such after processing and reverses the credit taken later - Revenue raises demand u/r 11A contending that appellant should have reversed credit taking the value of input after processing - Demand u/r 11A can be made only in case of manufacture of new product and mere processing does not amount to manufacture - Rule 3(3)(b) of cenvat credit rules lays down that credit is to be paid/reversed only in case of input on which credit is taken and appellant has taken duty credit only for the sheet metal parts which is reversed and not processing material - Appellant's application allowed :Cestat;
2007-TIOL-967-CESTAT-MUM.doc
Central Excise - Exemption for a life saving drug - Revenue denies on the ground that it contains calcium carbonate which is not therapeutically inert and thus not covered by the notification - As per the evidence addduced by the asessee calcium carbonate becomes therapeutically active only beyond a certain level of dosage which couldn't be rebutted by revenue - Assessee's appeal allowed
:Cestat;
2007-TIOL-966-CESTAT-DEL.doc
Central Excise - Assessee a manufacturer of dutiable as well as exempted goods and maintains separate accounts of inputs for availing duty credit - Revenue seeks to impose duty on exempted goods for violation of Rule 6(2) of Cenvat Credit Rules on the ground that assessee didn't maintain accounts of crates being used for exempted goods - Rule 6(2) is applicable in case of virgin inputs and not those credit availed inputs which have been already accounted once but find repeated use in manufacturing of final product - Assessee's appeal allowed :Cestat;
SERVICE
TAX SECTION
2007-TIOL-971-CESTAT-MUM.doc + st story.doc
Highly aggrieved Tata Technologies Ltd. finds solace in Tribunal - Rs.1.77 crores Service Tax demand set aside
Appellant acting only as agent for SAP India & enabling the group companies to procure the SAP software and its maintenance - Annual Maintenance payable to SAP India routed through the appellant - only SAP India or its parent company had the right to modify/upgrade SAP software & the appellant neither had the right nor access to the source code and hence the appellant was incapable of providing SAP maintenance service - appellant cannot be said to have provided Management Consultancy service to the affiliates - Service Tax demand set aside with consequential relief. :Cestat;
2007-TIOL-970-CESTAT-KOL.doc
ST - Assessee a new entrant in business - Avails amnesty scheme and seeks registration - Since tax and interest were paid voluntarily, no penalty is called for :Cestat;
CUSTOMS
SECTION
NOTIFICATION cnt07_069.doc
No change in tariff value of palm oil but revised
for brass scraps;
dgft07pn021.doc + dgft07pn022.doc
DGFT amends handbook to lay down procedure for
EPCG Scheme and adds Indore as 'Port Registration';
dgft07pn020.doc
Sugar quota to EU amended;
CASELAWS
2007-TIOL-380-HC-MUM-CUS.doc + bombay hc story.doc Customs Assistant Commissioner flouts the law laid down by HC - hauled up for contempt - let off on unconditional apology : HC
2007-TIOL-969-CESTAT-DEL.doc
Customs - Unjust enrichment - Appellant claims refund of excess duty paid on capital goods - Revenue denies on the ground that sufficient evidence not produced to show that the excess duty not palmed off to consumers - Since the assessee not included the excess duty in the cost of machinery, no unjust enrichment - Assessee's appeal allowed :Cestat;
|