CENTRAL
EXCISE SECTION
2007-TIOL-826-CESTAT-MUM.doc
Bulk
drugs sold to independent buyers were also being transferred
to their sister concerns - Rule 8 of the Valuation Rules, 2000
would apply only in case where the entire production is captively
consumed and would not apply in a case where some part of the
production is cleared to independent buyers - LB decision in
Ispat Industries, 2007-TIOL-245-CESTAT-MUM-LB followed
- Appeal allowed.
Department's
view that since the transfers of bulk drugs to their sister units
did not involve sale in terms of Section 4 of the Central Excise
Act, the provisions of Section 4(1) (b) of the Act, read with
Rules 6(b)(ii) of the Central Excise Valuation Rules, 1975 & Rule
8 (subsequent to 1.7.2000) are invokable not proper - Issue no
more res integra - LB Tribunal decision in Ispat Industries settled
the issue in favour of appellant:Cestat;
2007-TIOL-825-CESTAT-MUM.doc
Arrears - arising from one company being adjusted from the refund granted to another company in which the former has shares of 49% - the general principle that the share holder is different from the company, should be respected and it is not appropriate and legal to recover the dues from the money due to the appellant company :Cestat;
2007-TIOL-824-CESTAT-MUM.doc
Notification 42/2001CE(NT) - Merchant exporter failing to export goods within the period of six months - Manufacturer cannot be saddled with payment of Central Excise duty - Revenue appeal rejected.
:Cestat;
SERVICE
TAX SECTION
2007-TIOL-823-CESTAT-BANG.doc
Service tax - collection of royalty charges towards transfer of technical know how - not covered under the category of consulting engineer - Commissioner's review adjudication order is set aside with consequential relief. :Cestat;
2007-TIOL-822-CESTAT-MAD.doc
Service Tax - Banking and other financial Services - The equipment leasing does not came under the category of banking and other financial services - Stay granted
:Cestat;
CUSTOMS
SECTION
2007-TIOL-320-HC-MAD-CUS.doc + notice story.doc
Assessment order not given to importer - appeal dismissed on limitation - If department wants to take advantage of electronic assessment to deny service of order on the party, they have to amend the statute - As of now, the method of serving orders on the party as contained in the statute has to be followed : HC;
2007-TIOL-319-HC-DEL-Cofeposa.doc + cofeposa story.doc
Detention under COFEPOSA, ab initio void if the relied documents for the grounds of detention are not served on the detenu - If detention is void, action under SAFEMA cannot continue: HC; |