rlt080-Part6.doc
RLT Case Law Headnote;
CENTRAL
EXCISE SECTION
2007-TIOL-808-CESTAT-MUM.doc + dujodwala story.doc
Section 4 of CEA'44 - Related person - Inter Connected undertaking - Explanation to Sec.2(g) of MRTP Act applies in the case of two bodies corporate and not one body corporate - a body corporate and a proprietary concern (an individual) cannot be treated as related person :Cestat;
2007-TIOL-807-CESTAT-DEL.doc
Advocate agrees for pre deposit of Rs. 30 lakhs ? another advocate moves an application that the first one was not authorized ? Rectification application rejected ? matter referred to Bar Council :Cestat;
SERVICE
TAX SECTION
circular_procedural.doc
Procedural issues in Service Tax-clarification; circular_technical.doc
Clarification on technical issues relating to scope and classification of taxable services, levy of service tax and valuation of taxable services;
stnot07_036.doc
Service Tax - International in-bound roaming - exempted retrospectively; 2007-TIOL-806-CESTAT-DEL.doc
ST - Registration not taken and tax not paid - Tax and interest paid on detection - Penalty imposed for suppression of facts - Penalty sustained :Cestat;
2007-TIOL-805-CESTAT-AHM.doc
ST - Security Service - Penalty imposed for non-payment of tax - Since the assessee who has rural background was not aware of the new law it failed to fulfill his obligations - A fit case for invocatin of Sec 80 - Penalty set aside :Cestat;
CUSTOMS
SECTION
2007-TIOL-318-HC-DEL-Cofeposa.doc + diesel hc story.doc
Diesel smuggling case - Cofeposa detention quashed - grounds of detention given in English to illiterate detenu - Advisory Board did not follow principles of natural justice
:HC;
2007-TIOL-804-CESTAT-AHM.doc
Customs - Importer is 100% EoU - Caught clandestinely removing goods from bonded warehouse - Fine and penalty levied - Jurisdiction challenged - Assessee says it is the Excise and not Customs which has jurisdiction over 100% EoU - Since EoU consists of both Customs and Excise work, the Customs has the powers to take action - Assessee's appeal dismissed (para 6.5). :Cestat; |