| it07not169.doc
Rule
12 amended to notify new ITRs Forms;
itr-1-2pages.pdf
+ itr-1-3pages.pdf
for
Individuals having salary and interest income and no other income;
itr-2.pdf
for
Individuals and HUFs having income from any source except from business
or profession;
itr-3.pdf
return
of income for Individuals and HUFs being partners in firms and not
having proprietory business or profession;
itr-4.pdf
return
of income for Individuals and HUFs having proprietory business or
profession;
itr-5.pdf
combined
form for return of income and fringe benefits for Firms/AOP/BOI;
itr-6.pdf
combined
form for return of income and fringe benefits for Companies;
itr-7.pdf
combined
form for return of income and fringe benefits for Charitable / religious
trusts, political parties and other non- profit organizations;
itr-8.pdf
stand
alone form for return of fringe benefits for persons who are not
liable to file return of income but are liable to file return of
fringe benefits;
itr-V.pdf
Where
the data of the Return of Income/Fringe Benefits in Form ITR-1,
ITR-2, ITR-3, ITR-4, ITR-5, ITR-6 & ITR-8 transmitted electronically
without digital signature;
itr-acknowledgement.pdf
Acknowledgement
for e-Return and non e-Return;
2007-TIOL-255-HC-MAD-IT.doc
+ source
story.doc
Assessee-firm is a partnership entity - Income being less than Rs five lakh, no books of accounts maintained - Capital contributions of partners shown- Revenue for proving source of share capital of partners - Unless the explanation offered by the firm is rejected and the same is not genuine, the AO cannot invoke the provision of Section 68 of the Act.: HC;
2007-TIOL-254-HC-MAD-IT.doc
Sec 80HHC - Creation of a reserve fund one of the conditions for availing benefits - AO disallows on ground that assessee failed to comply with the conditons - Tribunal allows appeal as general reserve created by the assessee satisfies the condition - No law point involved - Revenue's appeal dismissed
:HC;
2007-TIOL-253-HC-MAD-IT.doc
Deduction for cost incurred for acquisition and distribution rights of feature films - AO disallows - Tribunal stand that the Rule 9B(3)(c) would be applicable to the assessee upheld
: HC;
2007-TIOL-252-HC-MAD-IT.doc
Assessee withdraws appeal pending before the CIT (A) and moves Settlement Commission u/s 245(1) - Commission rejects application for lack of pendency of any proceedings before tax authorities - Assessee goes back to CIT (A) for condonation of 19 months delay - Application rejected - Since the asseess has no valid ground, the Revenue order is valid
: HC;
|