|
CENTRAL
EXCISE SECTION
2007-TIOL-578-CESTAT-DEL.doc
+
11ac story.doc
Minimum
penalty under Section 11 AC - need not be equal to the duty
in cases where the duty was paid before adjudication proceedings
- P&H High Court order has no application in such cases:Cestat;
2007-TIOL-577-CESTAT-MAD.doc
Central
Excise - Refund - No cash refund of unutilized credit lying in RG
23A Part - II account on closure of unit :Cestat;
2007-TIOL-576-CESTAT-BANG.doc
Central
Excise - Refund of Education Cess - The Certificate issued by Chartered
Accountant has evidential value and merits acceptance :Cestat;
SERVICE
TAX SECTION
2007-TIOL-574-CESTAT-DEL.doc
ST
- Manpower Supply Service - Refund claim filed as assessee did not
provide any recruiting service but supplied manpower as per contract
- Since 'Manpower Supply' was brought under tax net only from June
16, 2005 and the tax was not passed on to the recipient, refund
claim is legally sustainable :Cestat;
CUSTOMS
SECTION
2007-TIOL-575-CESTAT-MUM.doc
Contract
entered into between the importer and the foreign supplier was for
the complete machine, 90% of which was imported at Nhava Sheva without
any objection by the Revenue - as such, import of the present consignment,
which is nothing but a part of the same contract, has to be held
as import of complete capital goods and not part of the capital
goods requiring any licence – Order of Commissioner(A) upheld, Revenue
appeal rejected :Cestat;
cnt34.doc
Adjudicator
appointed for many Chennai cases;
cnt35.doc
Adjudicator
appointed for M/s Fulchand & Sons;
cnt36.doc
Adjudicator
appointed for M/s Global Traders;
cnt37.doc
Adjudicator
appointed for Reliance Communication case;
cnt38.doc
Adjudicator
appointed for M/s Vasavi Impex Pvt Ltd;
cnt39.doc
Adjudicator
appointed for M/s Mitashi Edutainment;
dgft07pn003.doc
Import
from China through Nathula & Gunji ports : DGFT fixes CIF value
limit to Rs one lakh and Rs 25,000 respectively for a single consignment; |