|
CENTRAL
EXCISE SECTION
2007-TIOL-48-SC-CX-LB.doc
Repeated
appeal on a dismissed case - Supreme Court suggests that the
officer should have been more careful : SC Larger Bench;
2007-TIOL-47-SC-CX.doc + sc story.doc
Review by High Court - Where the order in question is appealable the aggrieved party has adequate and efficacious remedy and the Court should exercise the power to review its order with the greatest circumspection: SC;
2007-TIOL-438-CESTAT-DEL.doc
Central Excise - Cenvat credit on capital goods - separation of power plant from the steel plant by SAIL as a different entity- denial of credit on capital goods is not justified as the power is solely used in steel mill:Cestat;
2007-TIOL-437-CESTAT-MUM.doc
Duty is based upon MRP of the final product which remained constant irrespective of the fact of payment of higher duty - duty burden was borne by the appellant from own pocket and was not passed on to the customer - no unjust enrichment - refund allowable:Cestat;
2007-TIOL-436-CESTAT-MUM.doc
Export documents fabricated/manipulated by showing that export took place on 27.2.2003 (when S.S.Utensils were dutiable) instead of 03.03.2003 (when exempted) for en-cashing cenvat credit by way of claiming rebate - Penalty u/r 26 on Director not attracted as no goods held liable for confiscation & more over no penalty imposed on company:Cestat;
SERVICE
TAX SECTION
2007-TIOL-440-CESTAT-MUM.doc + BAS Story.doc
BAS
- Commission received by distributors on mutual fund distribution
- section 65(50) of the Finance Act,1994 adopts the definition
of goods from Section 2(7) of the Sale of Goods Act, 1930 which
defines goods as "every kind of moveable
property other than actionable claims and money; and includes
Stocks and Shares " - Benefit of notification 13/2003-ST
- Matter remanded : Cestat;
2007-TIOL-439-CESTAT-MUM.doc
Prior to 16.08.2002 Service provided by a foreign company having no business
establishment in India cannot be considered as taxable service & therefore
no service tax can be recovered from them : Cestat;
CUSTOMS
SECTION
ctariff07_052.doc
21/2002
amend to make it Nil duty for wheat; ctariff07_053.doc
Import
of portland cement exempted;
2007-TIOL-441-CESTAT-MUM.doc + settlement story.doc
Whether provisions relating to Settlement of cases under the Customs Act can be considered to be identical to KVSS justifying invocation of case laws under the KVSS - difference of opinion - matter referred to President of Tribunal
:Cestat;
|