|
CENTRAL
EXCISE SECTION
2007-TIOL-42-SC-CX.doc
+
sc story.doc
Modvat
Rules – Rule 57 E is only clarificatory and cannot affect
the substantive right of the manufacturer for credit;
2007-TIOL-392-CESTAT-MUM.doc
Rule
57F(8) of CER’44 prescribing that credit of SED paid on inputs
on or prior to 28.02.1993 may be utilized towards payment of duty
on final products cleared subsequent to 28.02.1993 but prior to
31.03.1994 – there is no restriction in the rule that utilization
of credit should also be prior to 31.3.1994;
Rule
only prescribes the period during which the final product are to
be cleared & does not speak about utilization – More over
the rule itself was introduced in August 1993;
2007-TIOL-391-CESTAT-MUM.doc
Notification
6/2000 CE – Filing of refund claim within 6 months is a substantive
requirement – if benefit of a notification is claimed then
the condition prescribed therein have to be complied with even if
they are only directory in nature – Refund claim beyond expiry
date rightly rejected;
2007-TIOL-387-CESTAT-MUM.doc
+ excise
sun story.doc
Expression
"exclusively" in rule 57R of CER'44 does not mean "mainly
or substantially" but "solely & only" - Usage
of capital goods for job work, an exempted activity, and also for
manufacturing a miniscule quantity of goods on own account - Credit
of duty on capital goods not deniable - Appeal allowed on merits
as well as on limitation as facts intimated to the department;
2007-TIOL-386-CESTAT-DEL.doc
No
penalty is warranted for delayed payment of duty under rule 8 of
the Central Excise rules - but interest shall be payable at 24%
p.a;
SERVICE
TAX SECTION
dgstair.doc
Space
selling by airlines;
2007-TIOL-389-CESTAT-MUM.doc
Appellant
acting only as “Co-ordinating agency” or “pass
through agency” between SAP India & affiliates who are
their group companies – Prima facie appellant only a wholesale
procurer of service & distributor of service to the affiliates
– may not fit in the category of “Management Consultancy
Service” – but probably under “Consulting Engineer”
& would be entitled to exemption notification 4/99 ST –
Prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit;
2007-TIOL-388-CESTAT-BANG.doc
Service
Tax – management consultants – the provisions of Income
Tax requires declaration of amounts still due from the debtors,
while in the case of service Tax, the same is to paid when recoveries
are made – service tax cannot be recovered based on the Income
Tax returns;
2007-TIOL-384-CESTAT-DEL.doc
ST
- C & F Service - Prabhat Zarda is not longer a good law - Assessee's
appeal upheld;
CUSTOMS
SECTION
seizureinst.doc
Clarification
regarding seizure of goods;
2007-TIOL-41-SC-CUS.doc
+ sc
cus story.doc
Classification
of Automated Sequential X-ray Spectrometer – the fact that
there was an in built computer in the spectrometer not considered
by Tribunal – matter remanded;
2007-TIOL-390-CESTAT-DEL.doc
Refund
for excess duty paid - Claim rejected by Customs on ground of unjust
enrichment - Commissioner (A) sets aside order and directs correct
quantification and verification of claims - Customs works out claims
but again orders the amount to be credited to Consumer Welfare Fund
- Since Revenue failed to challenge the Commissioner's order and
complied with quantification, the order to deposit the same to Consumer
Welfare Fund not sustainable;
2007-TIOL-385-CESTAT-MUM.doc
CHA
is not under any obligation to verify the quality of the goods or
value of the same – if goods exported are found to be of a
lesser value, CHA cannot be blamed for the same – Revocation
of licence is neither justified nor warranted; |