CENTRAL
EXCISE SECTION
2007-TIOL-105-HC-MUM-CX.doc
Assessee takes
credit on inputs under erstwhile Rule 57G after six months from
the date of issue of invoices - Tribunal says since invoices were
to be rectified and valuable time lost in correspondence but nothing
advance brought on record, credit allowable - Revenue's appeal dismissed;
2007-TIOL-295-CESTAT-MAD.doc
+ Arihant
story.doc
Central
Excise – Review by Board – Board directed Commissioner
to file appeal with Tribunal against three parties – Commissioner’s
appeal cited only one party as respondent – The order against
the other two parties attained finality – In such a situation
there cannot be any grievance against respondent.;
2007-TIOL-294-CESTAT-MUM.doc
Amount
of 8% of price of exempted goods collected from customers –
since amount remains already paid to the revenue, no amount is retained
by the assessee – Section 11D of the CEA’44 has no application
– LB decision in Unison Metals followed – Stay ordered;
2007-TIOL-293-CESTAT-MUM.doc
Appellant
company sick & registered with BIFR – no production activity,
no staff and Director engaged in BIFR legal proceedings, labour
disputes, MSEB recovery suits, DRT matters – delay of 457
days condoned as appellant was prevented from sufficient cause in
filing appeal.;
SERVICE
TAX SECTION
2007-TIOL-106-HC-KAR-ST.doc
+
hc st story.doc
Service
Tax on Tour Operator held legal;
2007-TIOL-291-CESTAT-DEL.doc
ROM
- Service Tax - Interest due on tax not paid - Period in dispute
- SC in Gujarat Ambuja Cements grants further two weeks from 13.11.2003
for non-compliance with provision of Sec 71A - Assessee accordingly
allowed two more weeks leeway till the discharge of tax liability;
CUSTOMS
SECTION
dgft06cir020.doc
Application under E-Com and physical format for benefits under DFCE : DGFT clarifies applications filed through E-Com on last date to be accepted as on time;
cnt07_020.doc
CBEC amends tariff value of only brass scraps;
2007-TIOL-292-CESTAT-MUM.doc
Doctrine
of Merger – Since the assessees appeals were disposed of on
4.7.2005 itself, appeal by Revenue on 20.9.05 cannot be entertained
as the Order is non est – LB decision in LML Ltd. followed;
|