CENTRAL
EXCISE SECTION
2007-TIOL-230-CESTAT-MUM.doc
+
indorama story.doc
Furnace
oil sent to job worker for production of electricity and consequent
transmission for manufacture of final product - Tribunal holds that
214/86CE job work procedure available & grants credit of Rs.1.13
crores;
Factory
of production referred to in rule 2(g) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002
is the factory where the final products are manufactured and not
where electricity is produced - LB decision in Ballarpur Industries
Ltd 2000(116)ELT 312(T-LB) followed. It is immaterial whether
the electricity is excisable product or not as this is not a condition
laid down under the rule 4(5) of Cenvat Credit Rule;
Input
"Furnace Oil" can directly be sent to the job worker as
such a procedure is allowed by Board in its Circular dated F.No.
345/2/2000-TRU dated 29.08.2000 & 637/28/02-CX dated 08.05.2002;
2007-TIOL-229-CESTAT-MUM.doc
Trade
discount relating to quantity purchased/dispatched or terms of payment
or volume of sale/purchase at the end of a specified period given
by supplier – consignee raising debit notes – no legal
requirement to reverse the excess modvat/cenvat credit availed consequent
upon reduction in sale price of goods;
Assessee availing
credit of quantum of duty paid by supplier – discount given
on the price inclusive of duty & taxes without affecting A.V
or duty paid – in fact the assessee supplier had received
less payment for his goods – no loss of duty to the department;
No exercise
conducted at supplier end for refund or short payment of duty –
there is no meaning in the action of the department to seek reversal
of credit;
2007-TIOL-228-CESTAT-KOL.doc
Central
Excise - Cenvat Credit - Application of Rule 6 of Cenvat Credit
Rules , in the present case, leads to an oppressive demand and the
fertilizer industries would face closure if the demand is pressed
- However, Rule 6 cannot be completely ruled out - Prima facie,
appellants cannot be said to have a very strong case - Directed
to Pre-deposit Rs. 20 crores;

SERVICE
TAX SECTION
2007-TIOL-226-CESTAT-KOL.doc
ST
appeal - Revenue asked to file affidavit to explain delay for condonation
- Non-compliance - If there is scant regard for law, maintaining
this appeal would be abuse of the process of law;
CUSTOMS
SECTION
corrigendum.doc
Corrects
10/2007-Cus;
2007-TIOL-88-HC-DEL-CUS.doc
+ sandeep
story.doc
Revenue lambasted
for continued non-appearance in Court - Government Departments,
who take the Courts for granted, should not be lightly let off for
their dereliction of duties - costs imposed;
2007-TIOL-227-CESTAT-MUM.doc
Customs
- Classification - Data Processing Unit - Importer insists for classification
along with calorimeter under Tariff Heading 9027.90 - Heading 84.71
specifically covers it and Chapter Note 5 (B) explanation clarifies
it ;
|